The Subsidiarity Principle and Legal and Economic Aspects of The Decentralization in Ukraine

Sergiy  Kvitka; Yevgeniy  Borodin; Volodymyr  Yemelyanov; Mykhailo  Moskalets; Viktoriia  Zubchenko

Sergiy Kvitka Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute for Public Administration National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine
Yevgeniy Borodin Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute for Public Administration National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine
Volodymyr Yemelyanov Department of Public Management and Administration, Director of the Institute of Public Administration of the Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Ukraine.
Mykhailo Moskalets Department of Public Administration and Law of Communal Institution of Higher Education «Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education» of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Viktoriia Zubchenko Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, Ukraine

Keywords: subsidiarity, political and administrative decentralization, deconcentration of power, local self-government, Ukraine

Abstract

The research highlights the peculiarities of the decentralization of power in Ukraine in the political and legal implementation aspect of the principle of subsidiarity. The objective of the study was to determine compliance with the political and legal aspects of the decentralization process in Ukraine based on global standards of the use of the principle of subsidiarity, during the implementation of decentralization reform. The research methodology is because the principle of subsidiarity is the main feature of the interaction of all levels of power. This premise is recognized in the European Charter of Local Self-Government and therefore means an urgent task in modern Ukraine. Financial decentralization, district consolidation, the creation of different but united territorial communities, changes in the administrative-territorial structure, ensuring the capacities of communities, the provision of public services in accordance with national standards must be based on the principle of subsidiarity. The information gathered makes it possible to conclude that the principle of subsidiarity is a barrier to the overly profound centralization of the state body and the separation of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sergiy Kvitka, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute for Public Administration National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute for Public Administration National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine.

Yevgeniy Borodin, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute for Public Administration National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

Professor, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute for Public Administration National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine.

Volodymyr Yemelyanov, Department of Public Management and Administration, Director of the Institute of Public Administration of the Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Ukraine.

Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administration, Director of the Institute of Public Administration of the Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Ukraine.

Mykhailo Moskalets, Department of Public Administration and Law of Communal Institution of Higher Education «Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education» of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, Dnipro, Ukraine.

PhD, Associate Professor in the Department of Public Administration and Law of Communal Institution of Higher Education «Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education» of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Viktoriia Zubchenko, Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, Ukraine

PhD, Associated Professor, Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

References

ASSEMBLY OF EUROPEAN REGIONS. 2015. From Subsidiarity to Success: The Impact of Decentralisation on Economic Growth Part 1-2: Creating a Decentralisation Index. A study commissioned by the Assembly of European Regions (AER).

BANTASH, Anastasiia; KOVAL, Viktor; BASHYNSKA, Maryna; KOZLOVTSEVA, Valentyna. 2020. “Balanced territorial economic development in the conditions of providing stability of human resources management” In: Economics. Ecology. Socium. Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 58-66.

BATANOV, Oleksandr Vasylovych; KRAVCHENKO, Viktor Vitaliiovych; PRYKHODJKO, Khrystyna Viktorivna. 2014. “Participatory democracy in local government system: problems of legal regulation” In: Public Administration Aspects. Vol. 2, No. 9-10, pp. 12-28.

BROWN, Lionel Neville; BELL, John; GALABERT, Jean-Michel. 1998. French administrative law. Clarendon Press, UK. Oxford, England.

CASTAÑO GÓMEZ, Liliana. 2017. “Modelos teóricos que explican el liderazgo político” En: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 33, No. 58, (enero-junio) pp. 34-57.

DECENTRALIZATION IN UKRAINE. 2020. Available online. In: https://decentralization.gov.ua. Consultation date: 14/05/2020.

EUROPEAN CHARTER OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT. 1985. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/168007a088. Consultation date: 14/05/2020.

HRUBAS, Viktoriya Viktorivna. 2015. The principle of subsidiarity in decentralization process. Grani, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 17-23. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.15421/1716003. Consultation date: 14/05/2020.

KOVAL, Viktor; MYKHNO, Inessal ANTONOVA, Liudmyla; PLEKHANOV, Dmytro; BONDAR, Victoria. 2019. “Analysis of environmental factors’ effect on the development of tourism” In: Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 445-456.

KOVAL, Viktor; SLOBODIANIUK, Olga; YANKOVYI, Volodimer. 2018. “Production forecasting and evaluation of investments using Allen two-factor production function” In: Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 219-226.

KVITKA, Sergiy. 2015. “The principle of subsidiarity and decentralization in Ukraine” In: Public Administration Aspects. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 28-35.

KVITKA, Sergiy; BORODIN, Yevgeniy; YEMELYANOV, Volodymer; IVASHOVA, Lіudmyla; BOCHAROV, Oleksii. 2020. “The foresight of national economy's digital development” In: Revista inclusiones. Vol. 7, special number, pp. 112-125.

MLED. 2020. Ukraine municipal local economic development program. Available online. In: http://www.mled.org.ua/ukr/materials/publications. Consultation date: 14/05/2020.

NAZAROVA, Karina; HORDOPOLOV, Volodimir; KOPOTIIENKO, Tetiana; MINIAILO, Viktoriia; KOVAL, Viktor; DIACHENKO, Yuliia. 2019. “Audit in the state economic security system. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development”. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 419-430.
NOYHAUZ, Norbert. 2005. Tsennosti hristianskoy demokratii (Values of Christian Democracy). – M. Respublika, RU. Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

OECD. 2020. Regional Statistics. Available online. In: www.oecd.org. Consultation date: 14/05/2020.

PROKHOROVA, Viktoriya V; ARTEMOVA, Elena I; MIROSHNICHENKO, Marina B; AVANESOVA, Rita Rafaelovna; CHAZHAEVA, Maynat Mausurovna. 2020. “Cluster Technology as a basis for the competitive development of industries in Russia” In: Revista de la Universidad del Zulia. Vol. 11, No. 29. Disponible en línea. En: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.29.17. Consultation date: 14/05/2020.

POPE PIE. 1931. Encyclique Quadragesimo anno. L'École sociale populaire. Montréal, Canada.

POPE LEO XIII. 1891. Rundschreiben unseres Heiligsten Vaters Leo XIII. (...) über die Arbeiterfrage: (15. Mai 1891: Rerum novarum") = Sanctissimi Domini nostri Leonis divina providentia papae XIII. Litterae encyclicae de conditione opificum. Freiburg i.B: Herdersche Verlagshandlung. Roma, Vatican (in Latin).

POPOVA, Olga L; KOVAL, Viktor V; MIKHNO, Inesa S; TARASOV, Igor V; ASAULENKO, Natalya V; FILIPISHYNA, Liliya M. 2020. “Assessments of national tourism development in terms of sustainability and inclusiveness” In: Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 377-386.

REGIONAL POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2018. History and Modernity European Integration: step by step. Fund «Yevropa ХХІ». Available online. In: http://old.europexxi.kiev. ua/ukrainian/program/zmi/book3/036.html. Consultation date: 14/05/2020 (in Ukrainian).

YANKOVYI, Oleksandr; KOVAL, Viktor; TROKHYMETS, Olena; KARPENKO, Maryna; MATSKEVICH, Yuliia. 2020. “Economic assessment of investment on the basis of production functions” In: Turismo: Estudos & Práticas. Available online. In: http://natal.uern.br/periodicos/index.php/RTEP/article/view/1310. Consultation date: 12/03/2020.