Buffalo meat quality, processing, and marketing: harnessing its benefits and nutraceutical potential

  • Sebastiana Failla Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Keywords: buffalo meat, dry aging, oxymyoglobin, nutraceutical compounds, fatty acids

Abstract

Buffalo meat production is growing in different countries also because buffalo products exhibit some positive characteristics for human health compared to red meats from other species. However, meat quality is also defined by organoleptic aspects. This review aims to highlight the distinctive characteristics of buffalo meat. The principal problems of buffalo meat production are related to the low yield and an abundant layer of  subcutaneous fat deposition when the animal is older than 14 months. This last trait, which may seem negative, allows us to carry out prolonged aging time (PAT) without compromising the shelf life and improving meat tenderness, one of the organoleptic characteristic’s consumers desires. Another organoleptic characteristic that guides consumer choice is color. This trait depends mainly on the amount and state of myoglobin, a species- specific sarcoplasmic heme protein, and buffalo presents a different molecule than beef. Furthermore, this bright red molecule in the oxidized state transforms into metmyoglobin or deoxy myoglobin in the absence of oxygen, giving a dark color to the meat, which consumers associate with poor quality from old animals. The presence or absence of oxygen shows advantages and disadvantages by acting on the one hand, on the bright meat color and, on the other, on the oxidation of lipids. The best compromise between the two situations is given by skin packaging, which preserves the meat in an anaerobic environment. Keeping the high nutritional quality over time is imperative to maintain the numerous nutritional properties of buffalo meat. In this regard, buffalo meat presents numerous distinctive characteristics among the different groups of fatty acids. Among the saturated one, the abundance of odd and branched fatty acids compared to the bovine breed should be highlighted; for the unsaturated ones, this meat is characterized by the abundance of biohydrogenation products by rumen bacteria such as trans vaccenic and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), best known for its anti- carcinogenic properties. In comparison, the endogenous pathway of fatty acid formation through the liver or adipose tissue allows us to enhance the elongation capacity of polyunsaturated n3 fatty acids, vital for human health as precursors of anti-inflammatory prostaglandins. Finally, buffalo meat is an essential source of N- acetylneuraminic sialic acid (Neu5Ac), a nine-carbon molecule located in the terminal ends of glyco-proteins and glycolipids, an essential nutrient for brain development and function. This molecule can also counteract the intestinal absorption of N-glycolyl sialic acid (Neu5Gc) exogenous for humans, abundant in red meat, with high inflammatory action. In addition to being marketed as fresh meat, Buffalo meat can also be transformed into semi-processed or cured products with peculiar characteristics. Lean products could be well integrated into the modern diet, with clear advantages to consumers and breeders. The nutritional and technological potential of buffalo meat is considerable, and it is necessary to communicate this to the consumer, creating an efficient and dynamic market for buffalo meat-based products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faost4at/en/#home (accessed on 8 October 2023).

Naveena BM, Kiran M. Buffalo meat quality, composition, and processing characteristics: Contribution to the global economy and nutritional security. Anim Front. 2014; 4:18- 24. Doi:10.2527/af.2014-0029

Di Stasio L. Brugiapaglia A. Current Knowledge on River Buffalo Meat: A Critical Analysis. Animals. 2021; 11:2111.
Doi:/10.3390/ani11072111

Santos D, Monteiro MJ, Voss HP, Komora N, Teixeira P, Pintado M. The most important attributes of beef sensory quality and production variables that can affect it: A review. Liv. Sci. 2021; 250:104573. Doi:10.1016/j.livs- ci.2021.104573

Jaspal MH, Badar IH, Usman Ghani M, Ijaz M, Yar MK, Manzoor A, Nasir J, Nauman K, Junaid Akhtar M, Rahman A, Hussnain F, Ahmad A. Effect of Packaging Type and Aging on the Meat Quality Characteristics of Water Buffalo Bulls. Animals. 2022; 12:130. Doi: 10.3390/ ani12020130.

Tateo A, De Palo P, Quaglia NC, Centoducati P. Some qualitative and chromatic aspects of thawed buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat. Meat Sci. 2007; 76:352–358. Doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.12.003

Dosi R, Di Maro A, Chambery A, Colonna G, Costantini S, Geraci G, Parente A. Characterization and kinetics studies of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) myoglobin, Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem. 2006; 145:230-238. Doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2006.07.006

Swartidyana FR, Yuliana ND, Adnyane IKM, Hermanianto J, Jaswir I. Differentiation of Beef, Buffalo, Pork, and Wild Boar Meats Using Colorimetric and Digital Image Analysis Coupled with Multivariate Data Analysis. J. Teknol. dan Industri Pangan 2022; 33:87-99. Doi: 10.6066/jtip.2022.33.1.87 J

Valin C, Pinkas A, Dragnev H, Boikovski S, Polikronov D. Comparative study of buffalo meat and beef. Meat Sci. 1984; 10:69-84. Doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(84)90032-9

Contò M, Cifuni GF, Iacurto M, Failla S. Effect of pasture and intensive feeding systems on the carcass and meat quality of buffalo. Anim Biosci. 2022; 35:105-114. Doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0141

Huang J, Liu X, Feng X, Zhang M, Qu K, Liu J, Wei, X., Huang B, Ma Y. Characterization of different adipose depots in fattened buffalo: histological features and expression profiling of adipocyte markers. Arch Anim Breed. 2020; 63: 61–67. Doi:10.5194/aab-63-61-2020

Settineri D, Failla S, Bisegna V, Di Giacomo A. Effect of different storage conditions on lipid oxidation in buffalo meat. Proc. “Meat consumption and culture”,44th ICoM-ST , Barcellona (Spagna). 1998; 666-667.

Failla S, Vincenti F, Saltarelli E, Contò M, Ballico S, Ficco A. Aging time effect on quality meat from buffaloes fed on two different diets. Proceedings of the 8th World Buffalo Congress, Caserta, It J Anim Sci. 2007; 6:2S 1195-1198

Jaspal MH, Badar IH, Amjad OB, Yar MK, Ijaz M, Manzoor A, Nasir J, Asghar B, Ali S, Nauman K, Effect of Wet Aging on Color Stability, Tenderness, and Sensory Attributes of Longissimus lumborum and Gluteus medius Muscles from Water Buffalo Bulls. Animals. 2021; 11:2248. Doi:10.3390/ani11082248

Failla S, Gigli S, Iacurto M, Di Giacomo A, Fioretti M. Meat quality in male buffaloes reared with two nutritive levels and slaughtered at 4 different ages. Proceeding of International Symposium on Buffalo Products, Paestum (SA), 1-4/12 1996 EAAP Publication

Ramanathan R, Suman SP, Faustman C. Biomolecular Interactions Governing Fresh 403 Meat Color in Post-Mortem Skeletal Muscle: A Review. J Agric Food Chem. 2020; 404 Doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b08098

Tamburrano A, Tavazzi B, Callà CAM, Amorini AM, Lazzarino G, Zottola T, Campagna MC, Moscato U, Lauretti
P. Biochemical and nutritional characteristics of buffalo meat and potential implications on human health for a personalized nutrition. It J Food Saf. 2019; 8:8317. Doi:10.4081/ijfs.2019.8317

Sekar A, Dushyanthan K, Radhakrishnan KT, Narendra Babu R. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on structural and physical changes in buffalo meat. Meat Sci. 2006; 72:211–215. Doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.07.003

Stella S, Bernardi C, Tirloni E. Influence of Skin Packaging on Raw Beef Quality: A Review. J of Food Qual. 2018; 1–9. Doi:10.1155/2018/7464578.

Hamed I, Jakobsen AN, Lerfall J. Sustainable edible packaging systems based on active compounds from food processing by-products: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022; 21:198–226. Doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12870

Shukla V, Kandeepan G, Vishnuraj MR. Development of On-Package Indicator Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring of Buffalo Meat Quality During Refrigeration Storage. Food Anal Meth. 2015; 8:1591–1597. Doi:10.1007/ s12161-014-0066-6

Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Mason SL, Bekhit A, El-Din A. Applied and emerging methods for meat tenderization: a comparative perspective. Compr. Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018; 17:841-859. Doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12356

Terjung N, Witte F, Heinz V. The dry aged beef paradox: Why dry aging is sometimes not better than wet aging. Meat Sci. 2021; 172:108355. Doi:10.1016/j.meats- ci.2020.108355

Barragán-Hernández W, Leighton PLA, López-Campos O, Segura J, Aalhus JL, Prieto N. Effect of in-the-bag dry-ageing on meat palatability and volatile compounds of cull cows and youthful steers. Meat Sci. 2022; 188:108800. Doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108800

Salzano A, Cotticelli A, Marrone RJ, D’Occhio M, D’Onofrio N, Neglia G, Ambrosio RL, Balestrieri ML, Campanile G. Effect of Breeding Techniques and Prolonged Post Dry Aging Maturation Process on Biomolecule Levels in Raw Buffalo Meat. Vet Sci. 2021; 8:66. Doi:10.3390/vetsci8040066

Dashdorj D, Tripathi VK, Cho S, Kim YS, Inho H. Dry aging of beef; Review. J Anim Sci Technol. 2016; 58:20.
Doi:10.1186/s40781-016-0101-9

Ijaz, M, Jaspal MH, Akram MU, Badar IH, Yar MK, Suleman R, Manzoor A, Farooq M, Ali S, Hussain Z. Effect of Animal Age, Postmortem Calcium Chloride Marination, and Storage Time on Meat Quality Characteristics of M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum of Buffalo Bulls. Foods. 2022; 11:3193. Doi:10.3390/foods11203193

Dąbrowski GI, Konopka I. Update on food sources and biological activity of odd-chain, branched and cyclic fatty acids. A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022; 119:514- 529. Doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.019

National Research Council (NRC): Carcinogens and anticarcinogens in the human diet. 1996; National Academy Press, Washington DC.

Juárez ., López-Campos O, Prieto N, Galbraith JR, Failla S, Aalhus JL. Chapter 5- Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Bison, Buffalo, and Yak. 2019. In: More than Beef, Pork and Chicken – The Production, Processing, and Quality Traits of Other Sources of Meat for Human Diet. Lorenzo J, Munekata P, Barba F, Toldrá F (eds) pp.95-117 ed. Springer, Cham. Doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05484-7_5, ISBN 978-3-030-05484-7

De Smet S, Raes K, Demeyer D. Meat fatty acid composition as affected by fatness and genetic factors: a review. Anim. Res. 2004; 53:81–98. Doi:10.1051/animres:2004003

Drouin G, Rioux V, Legrand P. The n-3 docosapentaenoic acid (DPA): A new player in the n-3 long chain polyun- saturated fatty acid family. Biochimie. 2019; 159:36-48. Doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2019.01.022

Failla S, Contò M, Miarelli M. Variability of sialic acids in meat from alternative species to beef and pork. Anim Front. 2003; (in press).

Kawanishi K, Coker JK, Grunddal KV, Dhar C, Hsiao J, Zengler K, Varki N, Varki A, Gordts PLSM. Dietary Neu-5Ac Intervention Protects Against Atherosclerosis Associated With Human-Like Neu5Gc Loss-Brief Report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021; 41(11):2730-2739. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315280.

Paleari MA, Beretta G, Colombo F, Foschini S, Bertolo G, Camisasca S. Buffalo meat as a salted and cured product. 2000; 54:365–367. Doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00111-4

Anjaneyulu ASR, Thomas R, Kondaiah N. Technologies for Value Added Buffalo meat products-a review. Am J Food Technol. 2007; 2:104–114 DOI:10.3923/ ajft.2007.104.114

Maheswarappa NB, Muthupalani M, Mohan K, Banerjee R, Sen AR, Barbuddhe SB. Buffalo Meat Processing and Value Addition. 2022. In: Asiatic Water Buffalo. Springer, Singapore. Doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2619-8_8

Ahmad SR, Sharma BD, Irshad A, Ranjan RK, Malav OP, Suman T. Effect of aerobic storage conditions on the quality of functional restructured buffalo meat fillets enriched with natural sources of dietary fibers and antioxidant components. J Food Proc Pres. 2020; 45(3):1–8. Doi:10.1111/jfpp.15072

Suman SP, Sharma BD. Effect of grind size and fat levels on the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of low-fat ground buffalo meat patties. Meat Sci. 2003; 65:973–976. Doi:10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00313-3

Ahamed ME, Anjaneyulu ASR, Sathu T, Thomas R. Effect of different binders on the quality of enrobed buffalo meat cutlets and their shelf-life at refrigeration storage (4±1°C).Meat Sci. (2007); 75(3):451–459. Doi: 10.1016/j.meats- ci.2006.08.008

Malik AH, Sharma BD. Shelf life study of hurdle treated ready-to-eat spiced buffalo meat product stored at 30 ± 3 °C for 7 weeks under vacuum and aerobic packaging. J Food Sci Technol 2014; 51:832–844. Doi:10.1007/ s13197-011-0592-9
Published
2023-11-21
How to Cite
1.
Failla S. Buffalo meat quality, processing, and marketing: harnessing its benefits and nutraceutical potential. Rev. Cient. FCV-LUZ [Internet]. 2023Nov.21 [cited 2025Aug.1];33(Suplemento):105-13. Available from: https://produccioncientifica.luz.edu.ve/index.php/cientifica/article/view/43297