Detección de partículas plásticas en sangre de equinos mediante Microscopía Electrónica de Barrido
Resumen
El estudio se llevó a cabo en la provincia del Guayas, ubicado en la región Costa del Ecuador, donde se analizaron muestras de sangre de 30 equinos de diversas razas (Pura Sangre, Poni y Mestizos) para detectar la presencia de micro y nanoplásticos (MPs y NPs), con animales de entre 2 y 12 años de edad, un peso corporal (PC) de entre 100 y 380 Kg, y una condición corporal (CC) de 5 y 6 (en escala del 1 al 9), seleccionados aleatoriamente, alimentados con pastizales naturales y suplementos balanceados, se utilizó técnicas de frotis sanguíneo y microscopía electrónica de barrido (MEB) para identificar y cuantificar las partículas plásticas, los resultados no mostraron la presencia de MPs, pero se identificaron NPs en el extendido de sangre de todos los animales, con un promedio de 51 partículas por campo de 1700 micrómetros cuadrados (µm²) a una profundidad de 5 micrómetros (µm), y un tamaño promedio de 426,33 nanómetros (nm), no se evidenció significancia en la cantidad o tamaño de las NPs entre los géneros (hembras y machos) (P=0,288), se observó una mayor presencia de NPs en equinos de menor edad (P<0,040), en la Raza pura sangre, las partículas plásticas encontradas fueron de mayor tamaño (P<0,020), y los Mestizos presentaron mayor cantidad de NPs (P<0,010), en comparación con otras razas, la investigación concluye que las NPs están presentes en la sangre de los equinos, lo que deja en evidencia la capacidad de estos contaminantes para ingresar al organismo y potencialmente causar efectos adversos en la salud, en particular, los animales más jóvenes mostraron mayor presencia de NPs en sangre, lo que sugiere que los efectos de la exposición podrían ser más severos en las primeras etapas de vida.
Descargas
Citas
Allen BS, Materić D, Allen D, Macdonald A, Holzinger R, Le-Roux G. An early comparison of nano to microplastic mass in a remote catchment’s atmospheric deposition. J. Hazard Mater. Adv. [Internet]. 2022; 7:100-104. doi: https://doi.org/pcxp
Schröter L, Ventura N. Nanoplastic toxicity: insights and challenges from experimental model systems. Small. [Internet]. 2022; 18(31):220. doi: https://doi.org/pcxq
Sáenz C. Microplastics in the biota of Andean rivers. [Undergraduate thesis]. Quito- Pichincha. Ecuador; University of the Americas;2020 [cited 02 dic 2024]. 66 p. Available in: https://goo.su/0ZGfj
Castellanos W, Paytan L, Curasma J. Ecotoxicological influence of microplastics on the haematological profile of fistulated Brown Swiss cattle. Rev. Cient. Cienc. Ing. [Internet]. 2023; 3(2):48-56. doi: https://doi.org/pcxw
Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR. Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci [Internet]. 2010; 126(3-4):109-118. doi: https://doi.org/cpjnh2
Holzer M, Mitrano DM, Carles L, Wagner B, Tlili A. Important ecological processes are affected by the accumulation and trophic transfer of nanoplastics in a freshwater periphyton-grazer food chain. Sci Total Environ .[Internet]. 2019; 646: 1048-1056. doi: https://doi.org/gfb49j
Long Y, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Liu R, Qiu Z, Li J, Wang W, Li X, Yin L, Wen X. Are microplastics in livestock and poultry manure an emerging threat to agricultural soil safety?. Environ Sci Pollut Res. [Internet]. 2024; 31(10):11543–11558 doi: https://doi.org/gtm7dz
Marcelino RC, Cardoso RM, Domingues ELBC, Gonçalves RV, Lima GDA, Novaes RD. The emerging risk of microplastics and nanoplastics on the microstructure and function of reproductive organs in mammals: A systematic review of preclinical evidence. Life Sci. [Internet]. 2022; 295:120404. doi: https://doi.org/gpzkgg
Masciarelli E, Casorri L, Di Luigi M, Beni C, Valentini M, Costantini E, Aielli L, Reale M. Microplastics in Agricultural Crops and Their Possible Impact on Farmers’ Health: A Review. IJERPH . [Internet]. 2025; 22(1):45. doi: https://doi.org/pcxx
Liu M, Liu J, Xiong F, Xu K, Pu Y, Huang J, Zhang J, Pu Y, Sun R, Cheng K. Research advances of microplastics and potential health risks of microplastics on terrestrial higher mammals: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. ENV GEOCH H. [Internet]. 2023; 45(6):2803-2838. doi: https://doi.org/gv6vg4
De La Torre GE. Microplásticos en el medio marino: una problemática que abordar. Rev. Sci. Tecnology. [Internet]. 2019[citado el 02 dic 2024]; 15(14):27-37. Disponible en: https://goo.su/8C30W
Ham DH, Choi JS, Choi JH, Park WT. Microfluidic thrombosis analysis system: possibilities and limitations. Micro Nano Syst. Lett. [Internet]. 2023;11:17. doi: https://doi.org/pcx2
García S. Referencias históricas y evolución de los plásticos. Rev. Iberoam. Polym. [Internet]. 2009[cited Nov. 12 2024]; 10(1):71-80. Disponible en: https://goo.su/lKre
Celi-Simbaña SS, Andrade-Mora DS, Loza-Pavón SJ, Bermeo-Sierra TI. Microplásticos, un problema de salud pública emergente. Rev. Inf. Sci. [Internet]. 2023; 102:4-9. doi: https://doi.org/pcx3
Gallo C, Gimple J, Villaroel R, Goméz-Lopéz C, Méndez G, Saavedra-Sotomayor MA. Bioethics Advisory Committee, Fondecyt-Conicyt: Bioethical aspects of animal experimentation: FONDECYT-CONICYT. [Internet]. 2009 [cited Nov 28 2024]; 23-27 p. Available in: https://goo.su/Qnbo8la
Gobierno Provincial Autónomo Descentralizado del Guayas (GPADG). Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial de la Provincia del Guayas. Guayaquil; 2021 [cited December 2 2024]. Available in: https://goo.su/5rYlA
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). Resultados Nacionales con Resúmenes Provinciales CNA. [Internet]. 2000 [cited December 2 2024]. Available in: https://goo.su/RcjCr4
Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares. Equine Vet. J. [Internet]. 1983; 15(6):371–372. doi: https://doi: https://doi.org/d3bw7b
León R, Bonifaz N, Gutiérrez F. Pastos y forrajes del Ecuador: Siembra y producción de pastos.1th. ed. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana; 2018.
Rochman CM, Hoh E, Kurobe T, Teh SJ. Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. Scientific Reports. [Internet]. 2013; 3:3263. doi: https://doi.org/gf7cz3
De Castro T, Valdez L, Rodríguez M, Benquet N, Rubianes E. Decline in assayable progesterone in bovine serum under different storage conditions. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. [Internet]. 2004; 36:381–384. doi: https://doi.org/ft5cqq
Andrade-Becerra R, Pérez-Rubiano C, Vargas-Avella J. Manual de prácticas de laboratorio en Microbiología Veterinaria. 1th. ed. Tunja: UPTC; 2023. 25 p. doi: https://doi.org/pcz7
Chandra J, George N, Narayanankutty SK. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut husk fibre. Rev. Carbohydr. Polym. [Internet]. 2016; 142:158–166. doi: https://doi.org/ggczwc
Reyes-Zambrano SJ, Lecona-Guzmán CA, Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Santana-Buzzy N, Slas-Flores I, Tzec-Simá M, Barredo- Pool FA, Ruiz-Lau N, Ávila-Miranda ME. Scanning electron microscopy and enzymatic analysis in Agave americana during Fusarium oxysporum infection. Mex J Phytopathol. [Internet]. 2020; 38(3):408–419. doi: https://doi.org/pcz8
Lusher AL, Welden NA, Sobral P, Cole M. Sampling, isolation, and identification of microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates. Analytical Methods. [Internet]. 2017; 9(9):1346-1360. doi: https://doi.org/gf428t
Van-Cauwenberghe L, Devriese L, Galgani F, Robbens J, Janssen CR. Microplastics in sediments: A review of techniques, occurrence and effects. Mar. Environ. Res. [Internet]. 2015; 111:5-17.doi: https://doi.org/ggrmr2
Mithun MH, Bin-Shaikat MF, Sazzad SA, Billah M, Salehin S, Foysal AM, Jubayer A, Islam R, Anzum A, Rahman- Sunny A. Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems: Sources, Impacts, and Challenges for Biodiversity, Food Security, and Human Health - A Meta-Analysis. Angiotherapy. [Internet]. 2024; 8(11):100035.doi: https://doi.org/pcz9
Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK. Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J. Mater Phys. Chem. [Internet]. 2014; 2(1):1–8. doi: https://doi.org/gjjkxb
Dagnino J. Biostatistics and epidemiology. Analysis of variance and correlation. Rev. Chil. Anest. [Internet]. 2014; 43(2):306-310. doi: https://doi.org/pc2b
INFOSTAT. Statistical analysis for research and management. Infostat. [Internet]. 2020[cited December 12 2024]. Available in: https://goo.su/zzVz4f
Wright SL, Rowe D, Thompson RC, Galloway TS. Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms. Curr. Biol. [Internet]. 2013; 23(23):2186– 2190. doi: https://doi.org/p92
Prata JC, Patrico-Silva AL, Da-Costa JP, Dias-Pereira P, Carvalho A, Fernandes AJ, Da Costa FM, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T. Microplastics in internal tissues of companion animals from urban environments. Animals. [Internet]. 2022; 12(15):1979. doi: https://doi.org/pc2c
Bahrani F, Mohammadi A, Obaradaran S, De La Torre GE, Ramavandi B, SaeedI R, Tekle-Röttering A. Accumulation of microplastics in edible tissues of livestock (Cow and sheep). SSRN [Internet]. 2023; 4:6-10. Preprint. doi: https://doi.org/pc2d
Arthur CM, Baker J, Bamford H. Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects, and Fate of Microplastic Marine Debris; 2008 September 9-11; University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, USA. Group; 2009. p 530. Available in: https://n9.cl/zsnqox
Lacava JE, Schmaedke A, Denaro MA, Bernabeu PR, Gargarello RM. Evaluation of the presence of microplastics on the beaches of the Río de la Plata: Buenos Aires City and surroundings. Rev. AIDIS Ing. Cienc. Ambient. [Internet]. 2022; 15(3):1163-1173. doi: https://doi.org/pc2f
Bilal M, Taj M, Ul-Hassan H, Yaqub A, Shah MIA, Sohail M, Rafiq N, Atique U, Abbas M, Sultana S, Abdali U, Arai T. First Report on Microplastics Quantification in Poultry Chicken and Potential Human Health Risks in Pakistan. Toxics. [Internet]. 2023; 11(7):612. doi: https://doi.org/gwnxcx
Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, Catalano P, Notarstefano V, Carnevali O, Papa F, Rongioletti MCA, Baiocco F, Draghi S, D’Amore E, Rinaldo D, Giorgini E. Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ. Int. [Internet]. 2021; 146:106-274. doi: https://doi.org/ghqfkv
Amato-Lourenço LF, Carvalho-Oliveira R, Ribeiro-Júnior G, Dos Santos-Galvão L, Augusto-Ando R, Mauad T. Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue. J. Hazard Mater. [Internet]. 2021; 416:124-126. doi: https://doi.org/gj6frf
Urli S, Corte-Pause F, CrociatI M, Baufeld A, Monaci M, Stradaioli G. Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on livestock health: An emerging risk for reproductive efficiency. Animals. [Internet]. 2023; 13(7):1132. doi: https://doi.org/pc2g
Grechi N, Ferronato GA, Devkota S, Ferraz MAMM. Microplastics are detected in bull and dog sperm and polystyrene microparticles impair sperm fertilization. Biol. Reprod. [Internet]. 2024; 111(6):1341-1351. doi: https://doi.org/pc2h
Talsnes CE, Andrade AJ, Kuriyama SN, Taylor JA, Vom- Saal FS. Components of plastic: experimental studies in animals and relevance for human health. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. [Internet]. 2009; 364(1526):2079–2096. doi: https://doi.org/bqsrn9
Blackburn K, Green D. The potential effects of microplastics on human health: What is known and what is unknown. Ambio. [Internet]. 2022; 51(3):518-530. doi: https://doi.org/gm28cb
Wang W, Guan J, Feng Y, Nie L, Xu Y, Xu H, Fu F. Polystyrene microplastics induced nephrotoxicity associated with oxidative stress, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress in juvenile rats. Front. Nutr. [Internet]. 2023; 9:1059660. doi: https://doi.org/pc2j
Ying-Yong CQ, Valitaveettil S, Tang BL. Toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics in mammalian systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health. [Internet]. 2020; 17(5):1509. doi: https://doi.org/gjf83k
Deng Y, Zhang Y, Lemos B, Ren H. Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci. Rep. [Internet]. 2017; 7:46-87. doi: https://doi.org/f945n3
