semiotic code in Ancient Rus can be taken as an example. The groups of skomorokhs were 
also distinguished by specific clothes, masks, musical instruments, etc. However, although 
having  such  bright  image,  the  episodicity  of  performance  production  by  these  groups 
problematized  the  issue  of skomorokhs’  community  as  a  professional  one.  They are more 
likely traced back to pagan myth-ritual practices, for which the performance was rather a 
form than content (Zhuravlev, Nestik, 2011). 
Actors’  communities  can  be  also  typologized,  singling  out  the  professional  one 
consisting of actors with professional education. It can be spatially represented by actors of 
provincial  or  metropolitan  theaters;  the  subprofessional  community,  which  comprised 
amateur  actors  without  professional  education  and  related  to  professional  community 
episodically and partially. The members of that community were rather often localized by 
the stage in houses of culture, unspecialized premises (basements, attics, art cafes), street 
spaces;  near-theater  community  consisting  of  people  close  to  artistic  environment  and 
involved  into  different  artistic  projects  from  time  to time,  though  not  losing  the  contact 
with the artistic environment.  
The  presented  typologies  of  the  actor’s  emotional  nature  are  grouped  around  the 
performance specific “energy center” (and here the analogies with energy understanding in 
S. Freud’s psychoanalysis, B. Massumi’s vital energy and А. Badiou’s transforming effect of 
Event  are  appropriate).  Performance,  in  its  realization,  sets  specific  spatial-time 
boundaries-discontinuities, which deliberately take the subject out of the sphere of trivial 
and  secular,  and  “suspend”  habitual  practices  (B.  Massumi)  in  the  excess  of  acting,  life 
principle  that  is  realized  “here  and  now”,  at  the  moment,  during  the  performance.  The 
Event, as the power or energy of sense, as well as Acting, last outside it. Here, we take the 
liberty to designate it with the capital letter, since it produces performance as a profession 
and sets it as a goal in itself, creating both a separate person (and transforming it) and the 
whole community, which we call the artistic subculture and define it as the community of 
people with the main and single goal to produce performance (Lipovetsky, Beumers, 2012). 
Professional mythologems do not only mark the actors’ community but also preserve 
it, mark its boundaries. Moreover, the latter are necessary to preserve the community. The 
phenomenon  of  “personal”  mythologems  –  superstitions  and  beliefs  –  speaks  of  the 
appropriation  of  the  whole  actors’  mythology  by  a  certain  subject,  subjectivization  of 
collective performances, thus verifying their “live” character. If the assertion that the myth