REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. 3ª época. Año 12 N° 34, 2021  
					
					
					fertility, many children, the lowest life expectancy, fewmigrants, the highest morbidity, very  
					low literacy and education levels, strong corruption, the worst indicators of all variables  
					reflecting the observance of human rights.  
					Cluster 3 (C3) - 26% of observations. This is almost the complete opposite of the  
					previous "dysfunctional" cluster: High NPI, low corruption, excellent indicators of the index  
					of happiness and equality, low morbidity, low birth rate, high mortality, many migrants  
					(
					Siluyanova, 2019).  
					Cluster 4 (C4) - 6% of observations. These countries show an average NPI, relatively  
					high inflation rates, and lowunemployment. The birth rate here is low, and the mortality rate  
					is very high. There are a lot of children and the elderly in the population structure, the average  
					number of migrants, average indicators of corruption, happiness, inequality, high literacy and  
					a high rate of remittances of migrants abroad.  
					Cluster 5 (C5) - 6% of observations. Typical features are a high NPI, low  
					unemployment, and no inflation. This is the average birth rate, very low mortality, high life  
					expectancy, very few old people and a lot of migrants. At the same time, the indices of  
					happiness and inequality are average, or high and a record indicator of outgoing remittances  
					of migrants.  
					We identified two “prosperous” groups, one group with dramatically poor  
					performance, and two groups in between. The map we have built perfectly reproduces the  
					geopolitical concept of dividing countries into developed, transitional and third world  
					countries. One of these concepts - world-systems analysis - suggests dividing the world-  
					system into core, periphery and semi-periphery with properties very similar to the identified  
					properties of clusters. Thus, “safe” clusters (C5, C3) represent the core, “dysfunctional” (C2)  
					—the periphery, and the layer (C1) —semi-periphery. We are even more convinced of the  
					similarity of the classification with the world-system interpretation by examining the lists  
					of clusters (Table 2).  
					The prosperous clusters included the European states and Canada (C3) and the  
					countries of the Middle East (C5). The disadvantaged cluster is the countries of Africa.  
					“
					Interlayer” (C1) - Asian and Latin American countries.  
					Next comes the most important part of this stage of the analysis; this is an  
					examination of the map of the distribution of individual variables (Figure 3).  
					327