Julio-Diciembre 2015
Vol. 5 No. 2
Octubre-diciembre 2024
Vol. 14 No. 3
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
661
Interacción y Perspectiva Dep. Legal pp 201002Z43506
Revista de Trabajo Social ISSN 2244-808X
Vol. 14 N
o
3 661-673 pp. Copyright © 2024
Octubre-diciembre
ARTÍCULO DE INVESTIGACIÓN
El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11154978
Elena Kirillova *, Anna Grineva **
Resumen
El artículo examina el concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de conflictos familiares.
El uso de las nuevas tecnologías en las actividades judiciales plantea retos a los
investigadores a la hora de definir las principales características y componentes de la
justicia digital. El objetivo de la investigación es considerar la aplicación de las
tecnologías digitales en las actividades judiciales relacionadas con los litigios familiares,
identificar los principales componentes y características de la justicia digital y proponer
un concepto de justicia digital basado en las características reunidas. Los métodos de
investigación se basan en el análisis de una serie limitada de estudios, que se
seleccionaron según parámetros específicos y se examinaron exhaustivamente; también
se aplicaron el método de analogía y el análisis comparativo. Como resultado de la
investigación realizada, se ha formado un concepto de justicia digital en los litigios
familiares, en el que se definen los principales componentes de la justicia digital:
desmaterialización del proceso judicial, acceso en línea a los materiales judiciales, uso
de la comunicación por vídeo durante los procedimientos judiciales y aplicación de la
inteligencia artificial en las actividades judiciales. Se han identificado las características
de la justicia digital: tecnológica, electrónica, a distancia, organizativa, orientada a
objetivos y característica del flujo de documentos digitales. Se han desarrollado los
principios de la justicia digital, que sirven como ideas básicas y garantizan la resolución
eficaz de litigios en el ámbito de las relaciones familiares.
.
Palabras clave: justicia digital, resolución de conflictos familiares, tecnologías digitales,
inteligencia artificial, interacción electrónica.
Abstract
The concept of digital justice in the resolution of family disputes
The article examines the concept of digital justice in resolving family disputes. The use
of new technologies in judicial activities poses challenges for researchers in defining the
main features and components of digital justice. The aim of the research is to consider
the implementation of digital technologies in judicial activities related to family disputes,
Interacción y Perspectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social Vol. 14 N
o
3 / octubre-diciembre, 2024
662
identify the main components and features of digital justice, and propose a concept of
digital justice based on gathered characteristics. Research methods are based on the
analysis of a limited range of studies, which were selected according to specific
parameters and comprehensively examined; analogy method and comparative analysis
were also applied. As a result of the conducted research, a concept of digital justice in
family disputes has been formed, in which the main components of digital justice are
defined: dematerialization of the judicial process, online access to court materials, use
of video communication during court proceedings, and application of artificial intelligence
in court activities. Features of digital justice have been identified: technological,
electronic, remote, organizational, target-oriented, and feature of digital document flow.
Principles of digital justice have been developed, which serve as basic ideas and
guarantee the effective resolution of disputes in the field of family relations.
Keywords: Digital Justice, Family Conflict Resolution, Digital Technologies, Artificial
Intelligence, Electronic Interaction.
Recibido: 27/03/2024 Aceptado: 29/04/2024
* Universidad Estatal del Suroeste de Rusia, Kursk, Federación Rusa. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-
7137-901X . E-mail: debryansk@mail.ru
** Universidad Estatal del Suroeste de Rusia, Kursk, Federación Rusa. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-
0001-8576-3522 . E-mail: kurskpravo@mail.ru
1. Introduction
At the present stage, there is a rapid implementation of digital technologies in judicial
activities, with interest in digitizing justice for family disputes, as civil litigation is the
most demanded form of justice (Linant de Bellefonds, 1994). Digital justice becomes a
useful tool for resolving family disputes as it allows for simplification and acceleration of
the process. Many countries offer the possibility of filing divorce or other family-related
documents online, significantly saving time and effort, especially if both parties agree to
the divorce (Velicogna, 2014, 2018). Hearings on family matters are conducted via video
conferencing, eliminating the need for physical presence, which is particularly useful if
the parties live in different cities or countries. Some countries utilize algorithms to
automate judicial decisions, such as property division or child custody determination,
helping to avoid human errors and expedite decision-making processes (Bilousov et al.,
2020). Digital technologies allow for easy storage and exchange of documents, such as
photos, medical records, and financial reports, which can be useful in resolving family
disputes (Benyekhlef et al., 2016).
The topic of digitizing judicial activities is of scientific interest, and researchers
examine various aspects of integrating modern technologies into justice; however, there
is insufficient research dedicated to a comprehensive analysis of the concept of digital
justice.
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
663
The aim of this study is to explore the implementation of digital technologies in
judicial activities related to family disputes, identify the main components and features
of digital justice, and propose a concept of digital justice based on gathered
characteristics.
2. Literature review
Analyzing digital justice for family disputes, experts note the benefits of online
hearings and digital tools, providing remote access to services, a clear way to interact
with the court, and the ability to receive information about case progress remotely
(Alarie et al., 2018). Describing the activities of digital justice, researchers paid special
attention to its main features, which allow not only to highlight the advantages of a
digital judicial system but also to provide a complete picture of the new legal
proceedings. These features include:
- Technological feature: the use of digital technologies and their integration into
unified justice systems, creating digital databases for interaction between judicial bodies
(Yildiz, 2007; Walker et al., 2019; Papavasiliou, 2020; Raso, 2021; Evans & Ndegwa,
2022; Voert et al., 2022; Creutzfeldt et al., 2024).
- Electronic feature: digital form of judicial proceedings (Schelenz & Schopp, 2018;
Hodson, 2019; Gertner, 2020; Singh et al., 2021; Razveykina et al., 2022).
- Remote feature: interaction is carried out in a remote format between interested
parties and judicial authorities (Schopp et al., 2019; Bănică, 2020; Gogić, 2022; Zeman,
2022).
- Organizational feature: the use of new organizational forms of court functioning
related to the implementation of technologies in court infrastructure, procedural, and
enforcement processes (Reiling, 2017; Adler, 2020; Zheng, 2020; Janssen, 2022; Tolou-
Shams et al., 2022).
- Target feature: transparency of judicial protection, increasing the efficiency of court
activities through technology implementation, increasing trust in judicial authorities
(Eubanks, 2012; Bruquetas Callejo et al., 2022; Rusakova & Frolova, 2022; Foussard et
al., 2023).
The analysis of selected studies on the topic of digital justice in family matters
allowed us to identify three main components of digital justice. Different experts in their
research consistently mention one or several components, emphasizing the importance
of these elements in digital justice for family disputes.
The first component is the dematerialization of the judicial process, which involves
fully electronic court proceedings in family dispute cases (Maslennikova & Vilkova, 2020;
Susanto et al., 2022).
Interacción y Perspectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social Vol. 14 N
o
3 / octubre-diciembre, 2024
664
The second component is online access to court information (Martin, 2014;
Zeleznikow, 2017; Buocz, 2018; Lupo & Velicogna, 2018; Velicogna, 2018; Re & Solow-
Niederman, 2019; Velicogna, 2019).
The third component is the ability to use video communication for interactions with
the court in resolving family disputes (Huq, 2015; Courts, 2018; Nikunen, 2018).
Digital access to the court is the opportunity for individuals and organizations to use
the internet and other digital technologies to interact with judicial authorities, file
documents, and participate in legal proceedings remotely (Viktora & Špaček, 2019). This
includes online registration of legal entities, filing lawsuits, participating in hearings via
webcams and video conferences, as well as receiving court decisions and rulings
electronically.
Experts have sufficiently detailed the advantages of digitizing justice for family
disputes in their works. Based on the main conclusions of researchers, we will thoroughly
analyze and supplement the main theses presented in scientific papers, as well as
formulate the concept of digital justice for family disputes based on components,
features, and principles as basic ideas necessary for the implementation of the concept.
3. Methods
To create the concept of digital justice for family disputes, we selected works of
researchers from different countries whose research, in our opinion, has a long-term
impact on research trends in this area. In this study, a desk review of works and
comparative analysis of studies were applied. For comprehensive analysis, studies
containing definitions of "digital justice," "digitization of family justice," "features of
digital justice," and "advantages of digital justice" were selected.
In searching for documents, we adhered to the standards of "Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA). PRISMA requires all stages
of searching and verification to be thoroughly described and documented by the
researchers. The PRISMA flowchart consists of four stages: identification of articles,
screening of articles, decision-making on the eligibility of studies, and final compilation
of the list of studies for inclusion in the systematic review.
Step 1: Data Collection
We selected works written by scholars on the following topics: "digital justice,"
"digitization of family justice," "features of digital justice," and "advantages of digital
justice." A bibliographic search was conducted in the Scopus database, Web of Science,
on the resource https://scholar.google.com.sv/scholar, on official websites where major
international legal acts are posted. We collected 151 publications across multiple
categories.
Step 2: Data Filtering Using Selection Criteria
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
665
Studies were selected based on the following criteria:
1. Authors must have at least three publications on the topics of "digital justice,"
"digitization of family justice," "features of digital justice," and "advantages of digital
justice" in the last 10 years.
2. More than 50% of the author's research should pertain to legal topics out of the
total number of publications.
3. The author's profile must indicate that their publications are thematically related
to legal sciences.
4. The work must have been written between 2010 and 2024.
With this approach, initially, over 151 publications were selected.
Step 3: Data Filtering by Reading the Full Text
We read the full text of articles for which it was difficult to determine the relevance
of the topic based on the title and abstract. After careful selection, 51 works were
chosen.
Using this methodology allowed us to identify the main components and features of
judicial activities related to family disputes, associated with the implementation of
modern digital technologies, and propose a concept of digital justice for family disputes.
4. Results
Digital justice in family disputes represents a new modern type of court organization
and operation, which is based on the application of information and communication
systems and network interaction through the exchange of digital data between judicial
bodies and parties involved in the case.
As demonstrated by the conducted analysis, researchers have identified the main
components of digital justice in family disputes. These include the dematerialization of
the judicial process (Maslennikova & Vilkova, 2020; Susanto et al., 2022), online access
to court materials (Martin, 2014; Zeleznikow, 2017; Lupo & Velicogna, 2018; Velicogna,
2018; Re & Solow-Niederman, 2019; Velicogna, 2019), and the use of video
communication during court proceedings (Huq, 2015; Courts, 2018; Nikunen, 2018).
Agreeing with the three-component approach in characterizing digital justice in
family matters, we will complement this approach with a fourth component, which
involves the application of artificial intelligence in court activities when resolving family
disputes. The use of artificial intelligence can solve many tasks:
- Analysis of judicial statistics using a search system.
- Drafting submissions to the court, lawsuits for the division of jointly acquired
property, allocation of parental responsibilities after divorce, arrangements for child
support, etc.
Interacción y Perspectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social Vol. 14 N
o
3 / octubre-diciembre, 2024
666
- Predictive justice, which allows determining the success of a case through statistical
modeling based on previously made decisions.
- Providing information on the progress of resolving family disputes through chatbots.
The use of artificial intelligence in judicial processes, including the resolution of family
disputes, can take various forms. Here are several examples:
- Automatic extraction and analysis of data: Artificial intelligence can be used to
automatically extract and analyze data from various sources, such as court decisions,
legal documents, etc. This can help judges make decisions quickly and efficiently.
- Creating decision-making algorithms: Artificial intelligence can also be used to
create algorithms that can help judges make more informed decisions regarding family
disputes. For example, algorithms can take into account factors such as age, income,
education, and experience of spouses when determining the amount of alimony or the
visitation schedule for children (Bedford-Strohm, 2022).
- Support in preparing legal documents: Artificial intelligence can offer assistance in
the process of preparing legal documents, for example, by using AI-based text
generation for quick and efficient drafting of statements, motions, or agreements.
- Speech and language recognition: Artificial intelligence can also be used for speech
and language recognition to speed up the court proceedings. For example, judges can
use voice commands or text messages to request information or make decisions during
hearings.
- Risk assessment and prediction: Artificial intelligence is also used for risk
assessment and predicting the outcomes of legal cases.
The application of artificial intelligence in the judicial process for family disputes is
possible both at the pre-trial stage and during the court process, as well as for creating
statistical reports and electronic archives (Boto, 2023). In the future, artificial
intelligence will allow the creation of service-oriented courts, enabling effective
interaction with plaintiffs and defendants and optimizing all stages of the legal process.
5. Discussion
Experts have dedicated their works to the use of digital tools in the field of family
justice, with much attention given to topics such as conducting digital court proceedings
in family disputes, electronic document exchange between parties, and electronic
communication between courts in resolving family disputes in transboundary cases. In
analyzing the works, the features of digital justice were identified: technological (Walker
et al., 2019; Papavasiliou, 2020; Raso, 2021; Evans & Ndegwa, 2022; Voert et al., 2022;
Creutzfeldt et al., 2024), electronic (Schelenz & Schopp, 2018; Hodson, 2019; Singh et
al., 2021; Razveykina et al., 2022), remote (Schopp et al., 2019; Adler, 2020; Bănică,
2020; Gogić, 2022; Zeman, 2022), organizational (Janssen, 2022; Tolou-Shams et al.,
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
667
2022), and target-oriented (Eubanks, 2012; Bruquetas Callejo et al., 2022; Rusakova &
Frolova, 2022; Foussard et al., 2023).
Overall, supporting the features characterizing the activities of digital justice in family
matters, we will highlight another important feature related to document management.
The transition in judicial activities from paper document flow to electronic has occurred
gradually. At the initial stage, judicial bodies began using electronic spreadsheets and
text editors for document creation and editing (Alarie et al., 2018). Then, electronic
document management systems appeared, allowing for document management, storage
in electronic form, and ensuring security (Buocz, 2018). Currently, most courts use fully
electronic document management systems, which have certain advantages:
- Time and resource savings: Electronic document flow reduces the time for
processing, sending, and receiving documents, as well as reduces costs for printing,
storage, and transportation;
- Simplification of control and management: In electronic document management, it
is easier to track all changes and versions of documents, simplifying the process of
coordination and approval;
- Improved security: Digital documents are more difficult to lose or counterfeit as
they are stored in secure databases;
- Convenience of access: Electronic documents can be quickly and easily accessed
from any device with internet access;
- Flexibility and scalability: Electronic document management can be easily adapted
to the needs of the organization and can be expanded as it grows.
Thus, when transitioning to electronic document management in legal proceedings,
there is a change in interdepartmental methods of documentation, which is based on the
exchange of digital data, digital databases, electronic networks, allowing for the
conclusion of another characteristic of digital justice related to a new form of document
management.
The use of electronic document flow, new digital technologies, and the application of
online formats fundamentally change judicial activities. To vividly demonstrate the
possibilities of digitizing family justice, we present a table showing the stages of judicial
proceedings and the application of digital technologies at each stage of legal proceedings
(Table 1):
Interacción y Perspectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social Vol. 14 N
o
3 / octubre-diciembre, 2024
668
Table 1
Digital technologies in judicial proceedings for family disputes
Pre-trial stage:
Creation of an electronic case for family
disputes, application of online mediation,
remote submission of statements using
statement constructors.
Preparatory stage for case
consideration
Digital document format, electronic
identification of individuals, remote
notification of process participants about
case preparation. Building a case
consideration model using artificial
intelligence
Case consideration
Use of electronic case files. Modeling of
the judicial process and development of
decision-making algorithms based on
similar cases, using artificial intelligence
Monitoring the execution of judicial
decisions in family disputes
Digital recordkeeping of judicial decision
execution, electronic distribution of
enforcement orders
Final stage
Creation of an electronic archive
Source: Authors development
However, it is important to remember that the introduction of new technologies into
the judicial system may face a number of problems, such as data security, ethical issues,
and the need to train judges and other process participants to work with new
technologies. Therefore, it is important to conduct thorough research and testing of new
technologies before their implementation in judicial practice. In addition, resolving family
disputes requires the involvement of social workers, especially when the case concerns
children's rights. Social workers in such cases interact personally with all parties
involved, as personal contacts with social workers and other professionals play a
significant role in resolving family disputes. Therefore, difficulties may arise in the
digitalization of justice when replacing face-to-face contacts with virtual interactions.
However, this fact by no means diminishes the importance of introducing digital
technologies into the judicial process and cannot serve as an obstacle to further digitizing
family justice.
Identifying the main components and features of digital justice allows us to formulate
basic principles for conducting judicial proceedings in family disputes with the integration
of digital technologies. The identified principles are oriented towards family disputes,
where personal contacts play a significant role, which are difficult to replace with virtual
interactions. However, in general, these principles can serve as basic ideas for digital
justice in other cases as well. The first principle defines access to justice, which should
be digital by default. The advantages of digital access to courts include reducing costs
of legal procedures, shortening document processing times, and more efficient use of
court resources. Additionally, digital access makes judicial processes more accessible to
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
669
people who may not have the opportunity to physically attend hearings. However, for
full-fledged use of digital access to courts, reliable and secure identification and
authentication systems are necessary, as well as modern technologies ensuring
confidentiality and protection of personal data. Overall, the development and
implementation of digital technologies in the judicial system can contribute to increasing
the openness and transparency of justice, as well as improving the quality of legal
services provided.
The second principle is the unity of the judicial technological platform, which implies
the use of modern technologies and innovations in the judicial system. This may include
the use of artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain technologies, the Internet of Things,
and other innovative solutions. The goal of such a platform is to simplify and expedite
judicial processes, making them more transparent and accessible to all participants. The
platform can be integrated with other government and non-government services,
allowing for the optimization of judicial decisions and enhancing their quality.
The third principle is the electronic format of case management, whereby the
digitization of family justice prioritizes electronic documents over paper documentation.
This is because electronic document formats speed up case consideration, eliminate
document loss, and facilitate efficient document exchange in an online format.
The fourth principle of proactivity considers changes in the statuses of process
participants. In the event of a change in status, judicial bodies must seek solutions to
address the life situation. This is particularly important in resolving family disputes, as
the status of participants in such legal relationships may change significantly. For
example, in a divorce, one of the spouses may become bankrupt, or a situation may
arise where one of the spouses decides to divide the joint business and change their
status as an entrepreneur.
The fifth principle is omnichannel interaction with plaintiffs, defendants, and other
parties involved in the judicial process. This principle allows for the use of any digital
tools for accessing services, including mobile devices, social networks, banking
applications, and email. All channels are interconnected, but for the convenience of
users, it is necessary to use an interface that is comfortable for them.
The highlighted principles will allow for the effective implementation of digitalization
in family dispute resolution, taking into account the nature of interactions between
parties in legal proceedings and ensuring a quality transition from offline justice to online
justice.
6. Conclusion
Based on the research, the following components of digital justice have been
identified: dematerialization of the judicial process, online access to court materials, use
of video communication during legal proceedings, and application of artificial intelligence
Interacción y Perspectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social Vol. 14 N
o
3 / octubre-diciembre, 2024
670
in judicial activities. Characteristics of digital justice in family disputes include
technological, electronic, remote, organizational, and targeted aspects, as well as digital
document management.
Principles of digital justice:
Default digital access principle;
Unified judicial technological platform principle;
Electronic document management format principle;
Proactivity principle;
Omnicannel interaction principle;
Thus, a concept of digital justice in family disputes has been formulated, outlining its
main components, characteristics, and basic principles. This concept is original and may
be further developed and expanded. At this stage, it is important to practically apply the
developed ideas and document the positive aspects of their implementation to refine the
concept of digital justice in family disputes based on the results obtained.
The scope of the study is limited by the size of the source sample, as previously
mentioned. In total, 152 scientific studies were initially used in the research, including
monographs, reports, and statistical data. After careful selection, 46 works were chosen
that specifically described the main components, characteristics, and advantages of
digital justice in family disputes.
In further research on digital justice issues, it is necessary to consider the use of
artificial intelligence in optimizing the judicial process in the field of family dispute
resolution.
Bibliographic references
Adler, M. (2020). “Justice in the digital state: Assessing the next revolution in
administrative justice by Joe Tomlinson (Bristol: Policy Press, 2019, 97 pp.,
£12.99 (pbk))”. Journal of Law & Society, 47, 170-174.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12219
Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. H. (2018). “How artificial intelligence will affect
the practice of law”. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68 (supplement 1),
106-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0052
Bănică, R. A. (2020). “Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19
pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights”. Revista
de Drept Constituțional, 2, 11-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-
0001
Bedford-Strohm, H. (2022, February 14). Digital justice. Media Development.
Available: https://waccglobal.org/digital-justice/
Benyekhlef, K., Bailey, J., Burkell, J., & Gélinas, F. (Eds.) (2016). eAccess to
justice. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
671
Bilousov, Y. V., Harllevska, M. B., Bondarenko-Zelinska, N. L., Trach, O. M., &
Chudyk-Bilousova, N. I. (2020). “Digitalization of civil justice in Ukraine”. Asia
Life Sciences, 1, 209-226.
Boto, J. M. M. (2023). “’To move is to stir, and to be valiant is to stand’. Some
challenges concerning free movement: Restrictions and guarantees post Covid-
19, new family models and digitalization”. International Journal of
Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 39 (2), 181-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/IJCL2023012
Bruquetas Callejo, M. M., Dubelaar, M. J., & Geertsema, K. E. (2022). “The lawyer
as a key player in guaranteeing access to justice in the digital era”. Recht der
Werkelijkheid, 2. https://doi.org/10.5553/RdW/138064242022043002006
Buocz, Th. J. (2018). “Аrtificial intelligence in court: Legitimacy problems of AI
assistance in the judiciary”. Retskraft Copenhagen Journal of Legal Studies,
2 (1), 41-59.
Courts, C. (2018). Modern families, modern family justice: Supporting
family relationships in fast changing socio-political-economic climates.
St George’s House Consultation in partnership with Relate and the Association of
Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC). Windsor: St George’s House.
Creutzfeldt, N., Kyprianides, A., Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2024). Access to
justice, digitalization and vulnerability: Exploring trust in justice. Bristol:
Bristol University Press.
Eubanks, V. (2012). Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the
information age. Cambridge: London: MIt Press.
Evans, J., & Ndegwa, A. (2022). Use of technology in the family justice
system: Annotated bibliography. Department of Justice Canada. Available:
https://justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/utfjsab-utsjfba/index.html
Foussard, C., Cruz, M. D. K. P., & Virgil, A. (2023). “Consequences of the COVID-
19 pandemic on child justice systems”. European Integration Studies, 19 (1).
Gertner, A. V. (2020). On the use of artificial intelligence in the electronic justice
system: Pro et contra”. Molodoi uchenyi, 49 (339), 211-215.
Gogić, K. (2022). “The impact of Covid-19 on the digitalization of justice in the
European Union”. CIFILE Journal of International Law, 3 (6), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.30489/cifj.2022.360561.1058
Hodson, D. (2019). “The role, benefits, and concerns of digital technology in the
family justice system”. Family Court Review, 57 (3), 425-433.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12429
Huq, A. Z. (2015) “Judicial independence and the rationing of constitutional
remedies”. Duke Law Journal, 65 (1). Available:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584488
Janssen, A. (2022). “Remote justice in urgent family hearings during COVID-19:
Climbing the ladder of legal participation”. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 43 (2),
133-157.
Linant de Bellefonds, X. (1994). “L’utilisation des systèmes experts en droit
compar”. Revue internationale de droit compar, 46 (2), 703-718.
Interacción y Perspectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social Vol. 14 N
o
3 / octubre-diciembre, 2024
672
Lupo, G., & Velicogna, M. (2018). Making EU justice smart? Looking into the
implementation of new technologies to improve the efficiency of cross border
justice services delivery. In: Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (Ed.) Smart technologies
for smart governments (pp. 95-121). Cham: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_6
Martin, W. S. (2014). “Court administrators and the judiciary - Partners in the
delivery of justice”. International Journal for Court Administration, 6 (2),
3-18.
Maslennikova, L., & Vilkova, T. (2020). Development of digital relations as a
leading factor providing access to justice. In: 6th International Conference on
Social, economic, and academic leadership (ICSEAL-6-2019) (pp. 422-
431). Atlantis Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200526.061
Nikunen, K. (2018). Media solidarities: Emotions, power and justice in the
digital age. SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 208.
Papavasiliou, N. (2020). The vicissitudes of law in the digital age:
automation as a mechanism for justice in family law. Thesis for Bachelor of
Laws (Honours), Queensland University of Technology, School of Law, Brisbane.
Raso, J. (2021). Implementing digitalization in an administrative justice
contextter. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3821117
Razveykina, N. A., Shikhanova, E. G., & Dmitriev, A. V. (2022). “Digitalization of
legal proceedings as a way to ensure access to justice”. Vestnik Permskogo
universiteta. Yuridicheskiye nauki, 58, 621-627.
https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-621-627
Re, R. M., & Solow-Niederman, A. (2019). Developing artificially intelligent
justice”. Stanford Technology Law Review, 22 (1), 242-289.
Reiling, D. (2017). “Beyond court digitalization with online dispute resolution”.
International Journal for Court Administration, 8 (2), 1-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ijca.225
Rusakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Current problems of digital justice in
the BRICS countries. In: Inshakova, A. O., Frolova, E. E. (Eds.) Smart
technologies for the digitisation of industry: Entrepreneurial
environment (pp. 143-153). Singapore: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12
Schelenz, L., & Schopp, K. (2018). “Digitalization in Africa: Interdisciplinary
perspectives on technology, development, and justice”. International Journal
of Digital Society, 9 (4), 1412-1420.
http://dx.doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2018.0175
Schopp, K., Schelenz, L., Heesen, J., & Pawelec, M. (2019). “Ethical questions of
digitalization in the Global South: Perspectives on justice and equality”. TATuP -
Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 28 (2),
11-16. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.2.s11
Singh, S., Kapur, P., & Mahishi, A. (2021). “Access to justice in a digitalized
world”. 2 (2), 41.
Kirillova y Grineva / El concepto de justicia digital en la resolución de litigios familiares
673
Susanto, A. F., Septianita, H., Tedjabuana, R., & Pratama, M. A. (2022). Social
justice education in digitalization era. Tahun: Nas Media Pustaka.
Tolou-Shams, M., Bath, E., McPhee, J., Folk, J. B., Porche, M. V., & Fortuna, L.
R. (2022). “Juvenile justice, technology and family separation: A call to prioritize
access to family-based telehealth treatment for justice-involved adolescents’
mental health and well-being”. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 867366.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.867366
Velicogna, M. (2014). Coming to terms with complexity overload in transbordere-
Justice: The e-CODEX platform. In: Contini, F., Lanzara, G. (Eds.) The
circulation of agency in E-justice (pp. 309-330). Dordrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_13
Velicogna, M. (2018). E-justice in Europe: From national experiences to EU-cross-
border service provision. In: Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (Eds.)
International E-government development (pp. 39-72). Cham: Palgrave
Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_3
Velicogna, M. (2019). Building information infrastructures for Smart cities: Thee-
CODEX infrastructure and API for justice project experiences. In: Rodriguez
Bolivar, M. P. (Ed.) Setting foundations for the creation of public value in
Smart cities (pp. 197-222). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
319-98953-2_8
Viktora, M., & Špaček, M. (2019). Organizational and process improvements of
invest-ment processes administered by Courts in the Czech Republic”.
International journal for Court Administration, 10 (1), 67-77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ijca.267
Voert, M. J., Pivaty, A., & Marique, E. (2022). “Access to justice in the digital
era”. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 43 (2), 3-12.
Walker, J., Marjoribanks, D., Misca, G. (2019). “Modern families, modern family
justice: Supporting family relationships in fastchanging sociopoliticaleconomic
climates (summary of the report of the consultation at St George's House,
Windsor, February 1213, 2018)”. Family Court Review, 57 (3), 301-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12438
Yildiz, M. (2007). “E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations,
and ways forward”. Government Information Quarterly, 24 (3), 646-665.
Zeleznikow, J. (2017). “Can artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution
enhance efficiency and effectiveness in courts”. International Journal for
Court Administration, 8 (2), 30-45.
Zeman, J. (2022). Digitalization and COVID-19 in the Justice Sector. In:
Kuběnková, D., Zeman, J., Puškárová, P. (Eds.) EDAMBA 2021: COVID-19
recovery: The need for speed: Conference proceedings (pp. 560-570).
Bratislava: University of Economics in Bratislava.
Zheng, G. G. (2020). “China’s grand design of people’s Smart Courts”. Asian
Journal of Law and Society, 7 (3), 561-582.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.20