
Fatty acids of sweat and body fluids in cattle / Anitaş et al. _________________________________________________________________________
6 of 8
activity of membrane–bound enzymes and signals occurring in the 
cell [19, 20]. Studies have shown that these fatty acids are found in 
the functioning of red blood cells, immune cells [21], atherosclerotic 
plaques [22], heart tissue [23] and other cells in the body. When Table 
1 is examined, linoleic acid, one of the important fatty acids, was 
found to be 2.06% in sweat, 20.09% in blood and 14.57% in urine. It 
was seen that linoleic acid is present in the blood at a rate of 0.27%, 
and this fatty acid was not detected in sweat and urine. The absence 
of linolenic acid in sweat and urine can be interpreted as an indicator 
body metabolism.
Studies have reported that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) 
positively affect the functioning of the reproductive system in 
animals [24]. In addition, some researchers have stated that PUFA 
supplementation to feeds increases the number of precursors for 
the synthesis of steroid hormones (estradiol, progesterone) and 
α) and decreases mortality [25, 26]. Therefore, 
interpreting whether they were low for the body was important for 
that the PUFA ratio was very high in urine and very low in sweat, that 
the body may form a defense mechanism to prevent 
Didara et al. [24] found SFA, MUFA, PUFA and n–6/n–3 values in 
the plasma fatty acid analysis of animals as 32.82, 13.11, 51.73 and 
16.55%, respectively. In the current study, SFA and MUFA rates were 
determined to be higher than the rates determined by Klous et al. [17], 
and PUFA and n–6/n–3 rates were found to be lower. Selionova et al. 
[18] found the SFA rate in cow blood to be 46.07%, the MUFA rate to 
be 31.56%, and the PUFA rate to be 25.44%. The SFA, MUFA and PUFA 
ratios of the current study were compared with those of Selionova 
et al. [18of [18].
Looking at the results in TABLE II, it was clear that there was a 
weakly positive, statistically (P
0.384, P
Furthermore, a significantly positive statistically significant 
P
urine. The relation between sweat and urine was determined to be 
PP
et al. [27] found in their study on 
human sweat fatty acids and blood fatty acids that there was a good 
association between sweat and blood fatty acids.
28P<0.01) 
connection between fatty acids as a consequence of the correlation 
study they ran to establish the link between the fatty acid levels 
of milk, blood, urine, and feces. They also noted that there was a 
strong positive association between urine and blood, which was 
P<0.01). TABLE II revealed a high level of 
positive correlation between blood and urine, comparable to the 
0.855, P
28] determined the dependent variable, the 
blood–corrected R
2
 rate, to be 0.835 and found a considerable level 
that the independent variables milk, feces, and urine fatty acids 
could satisfy 83% of the change in the dependent variable blood fatty 
acids. They also observed that the dependent variable, the adjusted 
R
2
 in urine, was 0.613, indicating a moderate association and that 
the independent variables milk, blood, and feces could account for 
61% of the changes in urine fatty acids, which was the dependent 
variable. When TABLE III was examined, it was seen that in the multiple 
regression analysis, changes in blood were highly dependent on 
changes in sweat and urine, and changes in urine, changes in sweat 
and blood. Therefore, it could be said that blood can be predicted 
be made.
calculated as 0.585 and the P
P
positive, the rate of change in fatty acids in the blood has a directly 
proportional relationship with sweat. Fatty acid ratios detected in 
the blood have an important place in estimating the fatty acid ratios 
in sweat, which was a dependent variable.
The urine regression analysis was determined as -0.483 and 
P
proportional relationship with sweat, and the urine was statistically 
P<0.05) in the prediction of sweat and did not help a 
lot with estimation.
PP
the rate of fatty acids in the blood was directly proportional to urine 
P
P<0.05). In other words, it was seen that the fatty acids found in urine 
blood fatty acids ratio, which was the dependent variable (TABLE IV).
If urine was used as the dependent variable, the association 
between sweat and blood appeared to be negligible (P<0.05). The 
P
indicating that the ratio of fatty acids in the blood was directly related 
to the ratio of fatty acids in the urine. The association between urine 
P<0.05) as 
a consequence of the investigation. In other words, fatty acids in 
urine considerably help the model predict the blood fatty acids ratio, 
which was the dependent variable. The analytical results reported 
and 28].
CONCLUSION
As a result of this study conducted to examine the relationships 
between bovine sweat fatty acids and blood and urine, a smaller 
number and proportion of fatty acids (14 in sweat, 25 in blood and 19 in 
urine) were detected in sweat compared to blood and urine. As a result 
found between sweat fatty acids and blood. It was also determined 
that there was a statistically high level of relationship between 
blood and urine. According to the results of the regression analysis, 
this relationship, it was determined that the independent variables 
sweat and urine could explain 81% of the variance in the dependent 
variable blood. In addition, it was concluded that there is a moderate 
correlation in the dependent variable, urine, and it can explain 79% 
of the variations in the independent variable, blood and sweat. The 
content of fatty acids in the blood can be estimated using correlation 
and regression analysis, but it is advisable to conduct a statistical 
study on a larger number of samples, and for this it is necessary to 
establish a formula with a high degree of precision.