https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e34332
Received: 07/10/2023 Accepted: 02/01/2024 Published: 27/02/2024
1 of 6
Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34332
ABSTRACT
In this study, it was aim to examine the local application of bovine
amniotic uid on bone fracture healing in rats. Twenty female sprague
dawley rats included in the study were divided into 2 groups of 10.
The sham group (n=10): Bone fractures were created in the right tibia
bones of the rats and xed with kirschner wire. After a four–week
recovery period, the subjects were sacriced. Local bovine amniotic
uid group (n=10): Bone fractures were created in the right tibia bones
of the rats and local bovine amniotic fuid was applied during xation
with kirschner wire. After a four–week recovery period, the subjects
were sacriced. Samples from all subjects were decalcied, stained
with hematoxylin and eosin, and new bone formation and brosis
were analyzed. When the groups were evaluated in terms of new bone
regeneration, it was determined that the new bone regeneration in
the subjects treated with local bovine amniotic uid were statistically
signicantly higher than sham group (P<0.05). When the groups were
evaluated in terms of brosis, the brosis value in the sham group
was found to be statistically signicantly higher when compared
with the local bovine amniotic uid group (P<0.05). It can be stated
that local bovine amniotic uid application may positively affect the
healing of bone fractures.
Key words: Bovine amniotic uid; bone fracture; local application;
bone fracture healing
RESUMEN
En este estudio, el objetivo fue examinar la aplicación local de líquido
amniótico bovino en la curación de fracturas óseas en ratas. Veinte
ratas hembra Sprague Dawley incluidas en el estudio se dividieron
en 2 grupos de 10. El grupo simulado (n=10): se crearon fracturas
óseas en la tibia derecha de las ratas y se fijaron con alambre
de Kirschner. Después de un período de recuperación de cuatro
semanas, los sujetos fueron sacricados. Grupo de líquido amniótico
bovino local (n = 10): se crearon fracturas óseas en los huesos de la
tibia derecha de las ratas y se aplicó líquido amniótico bovino local
durante la jación con alambre de Kirschner. Después de un período
de recuperación de cuatro semanas, los sujetos fueron sacricados.
Se descalcicaron muestras de todos los sujetos, se tiñeron con
hematoxilina y eosina y se analizó la formación de hueso nuevo y
la brosis. Cuando los grupos fueron evaluados en términos de
regeneración ósea nueva, se determinó que la regeneración ósea
nueva en los sujetos tratados con líquido amniótico bovino local
fue estadísticamente signicativamente mayor que en el grupo
simulado (P<0,05). Cuando los grupos fueron evaluados en términos
de brosis, se encontró que el valor de brosis en el grupo simulado
era estadísticamente signicativamente mayor en comparación con
el grupo de líquido amniótico bovino local (P<0,05). Se puede armar
que la aplicación local de líquido amniótico bovino puede afectar
positivamente la curación de las fracturas óseas.
Palabras clave: Líquido amniótico bovino; fractura ósea; aplicación
local; curación de fracturas óseas
Effects of local application of bovine amniotic uid on fracture healing in
rats (Rattus norvegicus)
Efectos de la aplicación local de líquido amniótico bovino en la
curación de fracturas en ratas (Rattus norvegicus)
Murat Tanrısever
1
* , Ozmen Istek
2
, Hatıce Eroksuz
3
, Burak Karabulut
3
, Erhan Cahıt Ozcan
4
,Muhammet Bahattın Bıngul
5
, Rıdvan Guler
6
,
Serkan Dundar
7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

*

Bovine Amniotic Fluid for Fracture Healing in Rats / Tanrisever et al. _______________________________________________________________
2 of 6
INTRODUCTION
Treatment of bone loss due to many diseases including
osteoarthritis, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis, traumatic
injury, cystic and tumoral lesions is dicult and requires a long
process [1]. Delay in bone healing occurs with a high incidence and this
is an important health problem [2]. About 5–10% of fractures undergo
delayed healing or result in nonunion [3]. The most important step in
the treatment of nonunion problems of broken bones is autologous
bone grafting, in which bone fragments are taken from a secondary
site and transferred to the fracture line in order to accelerate the
healing process. Although autogenous bone grafting is accepted as
the gold standard in bone healing, it can be faced with disadvantages
such as morbidity in the donor area where the graft is taken and low
quality autologous bone graft material [4, 5]. Researchers have been
developing alternative treatment methods for delayed fracture healing
for many years. Numerous approaches have been investigated to
accelerate maturation of regenerated bone, such as growth factors
[6], calcitonin [7], calcium sulfate [8], bisphosphonates [9], electronic
[10] and ultrasonic [11] stimulation. Various factors are dened that
support healing after fractures such as interleukins (IL); IL–1, IL–6,
some growth factors; broblast, transformed and platelet–derived
growth factors [12, 13].
Some researchers have explored the effects of human amniotic
uid, which is rich in growth factors, on fracture healing [13, 14, 15].
In addition, there is no literature on the effects of bovine amniotic
uid (BAF) on fracture healing. In the content of bovine amniotic
uid; mesenchymal cells, growth factors, macromolecules such as
hyaluronic acid (HA) and hyaluronic acid activating agent have been
reported [16, 17, 18, 19]. It is stated that HA suppresses the migration,
proliferation and chemotaxis of lymphocytes, and also reduces scar
formation by suppressing granulocyte phagocytosis and degranulation
and macrophage motility [20].
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of local use of
bovine amniotic uid which is thought to have a positive stimulating
effect on fracture healing on fracture healing in a rat (
) tibia fracture model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was approved by Firat University (Protocol Number:
24/02/2020–380123) Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committee. It
was carried out at the Firat University Experimental Research Center,
and the Helsinki Declaration rules were strictly followed during the
experiments. The rats used in the experiments were obtained from
Firat University Experimental Research Center.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bovine amniotic uid on
fracture healing in the tibia of rats and histopathologically examine
the bone tissues.
In this study, a total of 20 female Sprague–Dawley rats weighing
300–320 g were used. Rats were kept in 12 hours dark, 12 hours light
environment and temperature throughout the study period. During the
experiment, all animals were allowed easy access to feed and water.
The rats used in the experiment were randomly divided into two
groups. In the sham group (n=10); rats tibias were cut with an electric
bone saw and then repaired with kirschner wire intramedullary and
no additional application was used. In the bovine amniotic uid (BAF)
(n=10) group; rats tibias were cut with an electric bone saw and then
repaired with kirschner wire intramedullary and bovine amniotic uid
was applied to the fracture line.
BAF was taken from healthy pregnant cow by injector (ClickZip,Medical
Device Manufacturer, Thailand) under aseptic conditions during
cesarean delivery at Firat University Animal Hospital. The amniotic
uid was kept cold and transported to the laboratory. It was stored in a
deep freezer (Arçelik, 2533D, Turkiye) at -20 °C until the day of surgery.
It was used after waiting for 15 min to dissolve at room temperature.
Surgical procedures
The rats used in the experiments were administered intramuscular
injection of 50 mg·kg
-1
Xylazine hydrochloride and 5 mg·kg
-1
dose of
Ketamine hydrochloride for general anesthesia. All surgical operations
on the subjects were performed in accordance with the required sterile
surgical procedures. After general anesthesia, the tibial skin was shaved
and cleaned. Before the incision, the knees were washed with 10%
Povidone iodine. A linear incision of 1.5–2 cm in length was made on
the skin of the tibia diaphyseal region. After passing the subcutaneous
connective tissue, the tibiae were cut from the midline of the bone
with an electric bone saw and divided into two parts. Then, the bones
were reconnected with the retrograde intramedullary method with
kirschner wires by using an orthopedic drill. While no extra agent was
used in the sham group, 0.3 mL bovine amniotic uid was applied to
the surfaces of the fracture line in the BAF group. after the integration
of the titanium implants the skins of the rats were then closed with
suturing in their original position with polyglactin 4/0 suture material.
As an antibiotic, all subjects recieved intramuscular 50 mg·kg
-1
Cefazolin
sodium for postoperative 3 days to prevent infection. As a pain reliever,
1 mg·kg
-1
Tramadol hydrochloride was given intramuscularly for 3 days
postoperatively. In this study, the recovery period was determined
as four weeks, and at the end of this period, all rats were sacriced.
Histopathological analysis
After the euthanasia procedure, the tibias removed as a whole
were xed in 10% buffered formalin solution for 3 days. The muscle
tissues around the bones were then cleaned with the microtome
(Leica RM2125, Wetzlar, Germany) blade and placed in a decalcication
solution. Five days later, when the desired exibility was achieved in
the bone samples, the decalcication process was completed and
the bone samples were placed in separate tissue tracking cassettes.
After washing the samples under running tap water for about two
hours, they were passed through alcohol, xylene and paran series
in an automatic tissue tracking device and blocked with paran in a
tissue blocking device. Serial sections 3–5 microns thick were taken
from the paran blocks with a rotary microtome on positively charged
slides. The prepared sections were stained with the hematoxylin–
eosin staining method in an automatic tissue staining machine. The
samples were semi–quantitatively evaluated in terms of fracture
healing in the prepared preparations. The examinations were made
with a trinocular light microscope (Olympus BX43, Tokyo, Japan) with a
camera (Olympus DP72, Tokyo, Japan) and an imaging analysis system.
Fibrosis numbers were scored as followed: No brosis; 0, low-visible
brosis; 1, mild–visible brosis; 2, and dense visible brosis; 3. Bone
formation (BF) was scored as followed: No bone formation, 0; mild
visible bone formation, 1; moderate visible bone formation, 2; and
dense visible bone formation, 3 [21].
FIGURE 1. Decalcied histologic images of the Sham Control Group; (A:2X, B:10X magnication, Hematoxylin Eosine, C: 4X, D: 10X, Masson
Trichrome). *: Newly Regenerated Bone, ¥: Fibrosis
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34332
3 of 6
Statistical analysis
The SPSS 23.0 for Windows program (IBM SPSS Statistics for
Windows, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The
data for each group was expressed as mean ± standart deviation. The
Shapiro Wilks test was used to evaluate whether the data showed
normal distribution. The data was found to be normally distributed
and differences between groups were determined using the Student
Test. Signicance was evaluated at the P<0.05 level (TABLE I).
TABLE I
Histologic New Regenerated Bone (NRB) and Fibrosis (FRB)
parameters of the groups after the histological staining
Parameters Groups N Mean SD P*
NRB
Amnion 10 2,1 0,32
0,044
Control 10 1,7 0,48
FRB
Amnion 10 1,8 0,42
0,048
Control 10 2,2 0,42
SD: Standard deviation, *:Student
t Test (P<0,05). Statistically signicant dierence
detected between the groups
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
No bacterial infection was detected in any of the rats included
in the study during the experimental process. No fatal or nonfatal
complications were detected during the experimental period. All rats
succesfully completed the experiment. When the bone formation
between the groups was examined, it was seen that bone formation
was found to be statistically signicantly higher in the group in which
local bovine amniotic uid was used compared to the results of the
sham group (P<0.05) (TABLE 1). When the brosis values of the groups
were examined, the brosis value of the sham group was detected
statistically signicantly highly than the group in which local bovine
amniotic uid was applied (P<0.05) (FIGS. 1 A,B,C,D and 2 A,B,C,D).
Amniotic fluid, contains cells from the amniotic membrane,
decidual cells, decidual formations, and shed cells from the skin,
digestive, respiratory, and excretory systems of the fetus. It consists
of 99% water, inorganic and organic substances, salts and epithelial
cells shed from the fetus. Half of the organic compounds are proteins
and the other half are carbohydrates, fats, enzymes, hormones and
pigments [22, 23].
FIGURE 2. Decalcied histologic images of the Local Bovine Amniotic Fluid Group; (A:2X, B:10X magnication, Hematoxylin Eosine, C: 2X,
D: 10X, Masson Trichrome). *: Newly Regenerated Bone, ¥: Fibrosis
Bovine Amniotic Fluid for Fracture Healing in Rats / Tanrisever et al. _______________________________________________________________
4 of 6
Amniotic uid accelerate cell epithelialization and prevent protein
and uid loss on the wound surface, thus reducing adhesion formation,
while increasing broblastic activity with antibacterial and non–
immunological power. Therefore, they contribute to collagen synthesis
and reduce pain and inammation through angiogenesis. In addition,
amniotic uid is a biological product that can be obtained easily and
quickly, and its value is increasing [24, 25].
When the literature is examined, bovine amniotic fluid (BAF)
contains macromolecules such as HA and HA activating agent, as
well as insulin–like growth factor with activating on chondrocytes and
mesenchymal cells, as well as other growth factors [19, 26, 27, 28, 29].
Karaçal . in an  study, they reported that amniotic uid can
increase bone healing when applied to experimentally created rabbit
() calvarial defects by subperiosteal method [14].
According to the results of the study Karaçal  it was reported
that the local human amniotic uid increased the bone healing in a
statistically signicant way compared to the sham group [14]. Due
to bone regenerative capacity of bovine aminotic uid, the present
study aimed to investigate the effect of the usage of local bovine
amniotic uid on bone healing in experimentally created fractures of
rat tibias. In the present study, when the new bone formation between
the groups was examined, it was seen that new bone formation was
found to be statistically signicantly higher in the group in which local
bovine amniotic uid was used compared to the sham group (P<0.05).
This shows that the present study is parallel with the literature.
Kerimoglu  showed in a study that human amniotic uid had
a positive effect on fracture healing in rat tibias [13]. In the study, it
was stated that brosis was higher in the sham group compared to
the other groups. In addition, Kerimoglu  evaluated bone healing
with the scintigraphic method. It was suggested that human amniotic
uid may have positive effects on bone healing [13]. In another study,
Gokce  reported that local human amniotic uid increases bone
healing in distraction osteogenesis studies in rabbit mandibles [15].
Researchers have reported that locally applied human amniotic uid
can improve new bone formation around the bone in maxillofacial
operations such as distraction osteogenesis [15]. In the present study,
when the brosis values of the groups were examined, the brosis
value of the sham group was found to be signicantly higher in the
statistical evaluation when compared to the group in which local
bovine amniotic uid was applied. (P<0.05). Additonally new bone
formation values in the experimental group; local bovine amniotic
uid group, detected higher compared with the sham group. The
mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis and fracture healing are
very similar. Considering this aspect, it can be stated that bovine
amniotic uid may have a similar effect on bone healing according
to the results of the study carried out [15].
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34332
5 of 6
CONCLUSION
Within the limitaitons of this study, it is concluded that local
application of bovine amniotic uid may be effective in fracture
healing. It is seen that there have not been any studies on fracture
healing using bovine amniotic uid in the literature before, and it can
be thought that more detailed studies are necessary.
Conict of interest
There is no conict of interest.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
[1] Acikan I, Dundar S. Biomechanical Examination of
Osseointegration of Titanium Implants Placed Simultaneously
With Allogeneic Bone Transfer. J. Craniofac. Surg. [Internet].
2022; 33(1):350–353. doi: https://doi.org/gp5nmd
[2] Padilla–Eguiluz NG, Gómez–Barrena E. Epidemiology of long bone
non–unions in Spain. Injury. [Internet]. 2021; 52(Suppl4):S3–S7.
doi: https://doi.org/mhsc
[3] Wakeeld SM, Giannoudis VP, Giannoudis PV. Reconstruction of
a neglected hyperextension–bicondylar tibial plateau fracture
9months after original injury and review of the literature. What
outcomes can be expected? Trauma Case Rep. [Internet]. 2023;
45:e100823. doi: https://doi.org/mhss
[4] Andrzejowski P, Giannoudis PV. The 'diamond concept' for long
bone non–union management. J. Orthop Traumatol. [Internet].
2019; 20(21):21–22. doi: https://doi.org/gh7zs5
[5] Rodrigues M, Blattner C, Stuppia L. Amniotic Fluid Cells, Stem
Cells, and p53: Can We Stereotype p53 Functions? Intern. J. Mol.
Sci. [Internet]. 2019; 20(9):2236. doi: https://doi.org/mhsd
[6] Fadhil E, Dosh RH, Wally ZJ, Haider J. Histological evaluation of
the effects of bone morphogenetic protein 9 and angiopoietin
1 on bone healing. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. [Internet]. 2023;
18(5):954–963. doi: https://doi.org/mhst
[7] Mi J, Xu J, Yao H, Li X, Tong W, Li Y, Dai B, He X, Chow DHK, Li G,
Lui KO, Zhao J, Qin L. Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Enhances
Distraction Osteogenesis by Increasing Angiogenesis. Tissue Eng.
Part A. [Internet]. 2021; 27(1–2):87–102. doi: https://doi.org/mhsf
[8] Al Ruhaimi KA. Effect of calcium sulphate on the rate of
osteogenesis in distracted bone, International J. Oral Maxillofacial
Surgery. [Internet]. 2001; 30(3):228–233. doi: https://doi.org/fv8xnp
[9] Akbulut Y, Gul M, Dundar S, Ozcan EC, Ozercan IH, Bozoglan
A, Karasu N, Acikan I, Bingül MB. Evaluation of Effects of
Systemic Zoledronic Acid Application on Bone Maturation in the
Consolidation Period in Distraction Osteogenesis. J. Craniofac.
Surg. [Internet]. 2021; 32(8):2901–2905. doi: https://doi.org/mhsg
[10] Hagiwara T, Bell WH. Effect of electrical stimulation on
mandibular distraction osteo–genesis. J. Craniomaxillofac.
Surg. [Internet]. 2000; 28(1):12–19. doi: https://doi.org/cg9djh
[11] Schortinghuis J, Bronckers AL, Gravendeel J, Stegenga B,
Raghoebar GM. The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the
vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double–blind trial.
Intern. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. [Internet]. 2008; 37(11):1014–1021.
doi: https://doi.org/cw8qsr
[12] Hannouche D, Petite H, Sedel L. Current trends in the enhancement
of fracture healing. J.Bone Joint Surg. Br. [Internet]. 2001;
83(2):15. doi: https://doi.org/bx48z8
[13] Kerimoglu S, Livaoglu M, Sonmez B, Yulug E, Aynaci O, Topbas
M, Yarar S. Effects of human amniotic uid on fracture healing
in rat tibia. J. Surg. Res. [Internet]. 2009; 152(2):281–287. doi:
https://doi.org/dd5t62
[14] Karaçal N, Koşucu P, Çobanoğlu Ü, Kutlu N. Effect of Human
Amniotic Fluid on Bone Healing. J. Surg. Res. [Internet]. 2005;
129(2):283–287 doi: https://doi.org/bzr773
[15] Gokce SM, Karacayli U, Nalcaci R, Avunduk MC, Özgöçmen M,
Karasahin E, Gokce HS: The effect of human amniotic uid on
mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Intern. J. Oral Maxillofac.
Surg. [Internet]. 2015; 44(3):404–411. doi: https://doi.org/f633kk
[16] Dasari G, Prince I, Hearn MTW. Investigations into the rheological
characteristics of bovine amniotic uid. J. Biochem. Biophys.
Meth. [Internet]. 1995; 30(4):217–225. doi: https://doi.org/
dhbhbb
[17] Ravelich SR, Breier BH, Reddy S,Keelan JA, Wells DN, Peterson
AJ, Lee SF. Insulin–like growth factor–I and binding proteins 1,
2, and 3 in bovine nuclear transfer pregnancies. Biol. Reprod.
[Internet]. 2004; 70(2):430–438. doi: https://doi.org/cdszx4
[18] Decker M, Chiu ES, Dollbaum C, Moiin A, Hall J, Spendlove R,
Longaker MT, Stern R. Hyaluronic acid–stimulating activity in
sera from the bovine fetus and from breast cancer patients.
Cancer Res. [Internet]. 1989; 49(13):3499–3505. Cited in
PUBMED; PMID 2731171.
[19] Tanrisever M, Eröksüz H, Bulut S. The comparison of the effects of
intraarticular injections of bovine amniotic uid and hyaluronic acid
on cartilage tissue in an experimental osteoarthritic rabbit model:
histopathological and immunohistochemical results. Turk. J. Vet.
Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2017; 41(2):273–281. doi: https://doi.org/mhsj
[20] Lee HS,. Kim JC. Effect of amniotic uid in corneal sensitivity
and nerve regeneration after excimer laser ablation. Cornea.
[Internet]. 1996; 15(5):517–524. Cited in PUBMED; PMID 8862929
[21] Gunes N, Dundar S, Saybak A, Artas G, Acikan I, Ozercan
I.H, Atilgan S, Yaman F. Systemic and local zoledronic acid
treatment with hydroxyapatite bone graft: A histological and
histomorphometric experimental study. Experim. Therap. Med.
[Internet]. 2016;12(4):2417–2422. doi: https://doi.org/gbr3bs
[22] Kim JS, Kim JC, Na BK, Jeong JM, Song CY. Amniotic membrane
patching promotes healing and inhibits proteinase activity on
wound healing following acute corneal alkali burn. Exp. Eye Res.
[Internet]. 2000; 70(3):329–337. doi: https://doi.org/fwqnf3
[23] Sato H, Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsuboto K. Role of growth factors
for ocular surface reconstruction after amniotic membrane
transplantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998; 39:428.
[24] Piamo A, García M, Romero D, Ferrer D. Healing of a chronic
ulcer of the lower limb of venous origin with fresh human
amniochorionic membrane allograft. Biomed. [Internet]. 2022;
42(Suppl 1):17–25. doi: https://doi.org/mhsk
[25] Marangon FB, Alfonso EC, Miler D, Remonda NM, Mualem MS, Tseng
SC. Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane.
Cornea. [Internet]. 2004; 23(3):264–269. doi: https://doi.org/fxf6zm
Bovine Amniotic Fluid for Fracture Healing in Rats / Tanrisever et al. _______________________________________________________________
6 of 6
[26] Dasari G, Prince I, Hearn MTW. Investigations into the rheological
characteristics of bovine amniotic uid. J. Biochem. Biophys.
Meth. [Internet]. 1995; 30(4):217–225. doi: https://doi.org/dhbhbb
[27] Ravelich SR, Breier BH, Reddy S, Keelan JA, Wells DN, Pteterson
AJ, Lee RSF. Insulin–like growth factor–1 and binding proteins
1, 2, and 3 in bovine nuclear transfer pregnancies. Biol. Reprod.
[Internet]. 2004; 70(2):430–438. doi: https://doi.org/cdszx4
[28] Longaker MT, Adzick NS, Hall JL, Stair SE, Crombleholme TM,
Duncan BW, Bradley SM, Harrison MR, Stern R. Studies in fetal
wound healing, VII. Fetal wound healing may be modulated by
hyaluronic acid stimulating activity in amniotic uid. J. Pediatr.
Surg. [internet]. 1990; 25(4):430–433. doi: https://doi.org/dhb9b5
[29] Decker M, Chiu ES, Dolbaum C, Moiin A, Hall J, Longaker MT,
Spendlove R, Stern R. Hyaluronic acid stimulating factor from
the bovine fetus and from breast cancer patients. Cancer Res.
[Internet]. 1989; 49(13):3499–3505. Cited in PUBMED; PMID 2731171.