
______________________________________________________________________Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34328
7 de 7
[10]   Oyuela LA, Jiménez C. Factores que afectan la tasa de preñez 
en programas de transferencia de embriones. Rev. Med. Vet. 
Zoot. [Internet]. 2010 [consultado 27 Ago. 2023]; 57(3):191–200. 
Disponible en: https://goo.su/AUWTU.
[11]   Tovío–Luna N, Duica–Amaya A. Factores relacionados con la 
dinámica folicular en la hembra bovina. Spei Domus [Internet]. 
2012 [consultado 27 Ago. 2023]; 8(17):38–47. Disponible en: 
https://goo.su/YRoCz1
[12]   Morotti F, Moretti R, dos Santos GMG, Silva–Santos KC, Ramos–
Cerqueira PH, Seneda MM. Ovarian follicular dynamics and 
conception rate in Bos indicus cows with different antral follicle 
counts subjected to timed articial insemination. Anim. Reprod. 
Sci. [Internet]. 2018; 188:170–177. doi: https://doi.org/jrfm
[13]   Oshba M, Sosa G, Nossier M, Fadel M, El–Raey M. The Effect of 
Recipient Holstein heifers’ Corpus Luteum Type, Diameter and 
Secretory Potential on their Pregnancy Rate during Routine ET 
program in Egypt. Benha Vet. Med. J. [Internet]. 2019; 36(1):77–87. 
doi: https://doi.org/mfqz
[14]  Pérez–Mora A, Sura–Correa JC, Peralta–Torres JA. Factors 
associated with pregnancy rate in xed–time embryo transfer in 
cattle under humid–tropical conditions of Mexico. Anim. Reprod. 
[Internet]. 2020; 17(2):e20200007. doi: https://doi.org/d25q
[15]   Aguiar TS, Araújo C V., Tirloni RR, Martins LR. Effect of meloxicam 
on pregnancy rate of recipient heifers following transfer of in 
vitro produced embryos. Reprod. Domest. Anim. [Internet]. 2013; 
48(6):984–988. doi: https://doi.org/mfq2
[16]   Lopes LMJ, Balbinot M, Fonseca BA, de Araújo CV, Martins 
LR. Pregnancy rates and serum 13,14–dihydro–15–keto–PGF2α 
concentrations in recipient Nelore heifers treated with meloxicam 
after the transfer of in vitro–produced embryos. Theriogenol. 
[Internet]. 2015; 84(4):553–558. doi: https://doi.org/mfq3
[17]   Roper DA, Schrick FN, Edwards JL, Hopkins FM, Prado TM, 
Wilkerson JB, Saxton AM, Young CD, Smith WB. Factors in cattle 
affecting embryo transfer pregnancies in recipient animals. Anim. 
Reprod. Sci. [Internet]. 2018; 199:79–83. doi: https://doi.org/mfq4
[18]   Hasler JF. Bovine Embryo Transfer: ¿Are Eciencies Improving? 
En: Conference Proceedings Applied Reproduction Strategies 
[Internet]. 5–6 Jun 2010 Nashville, TN, USA; [consultado 22 Jul. 
2023]. p. 265–282. Disponible en: https://goo.su/o09O.
[19]   Ongubo MN, Rachuonyo HA, Lusweti FN, Kios DK, Kitilit JK, 
Musee K, Tonui WK, Lokwaleput IK, Oliech GO. Factors affecting 
conception rates in cattle following embryo transfer. Uganda J. 
Agric Sci. [Internet]. 2015; 16(1):19–27. doi: https://doi.org/mfq9
[20]  Hoedemaker M, Prange D, Gundelach Y. Body Condition Change 
Ante– and Postpartum, Health and Reproductive Performance 
in German Holstein Cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. [Internet]. 
2009; 44(2):167–173. doi: https://doi.org/fht8nq
[21]   Naranjo–Chacón F, Montiel–Palacios F, Canseco–Sedano R, 
Ahuja–Aguirre C. Embryo production in middle–aged and mature 
Bos taurus × Bos indicus cows induced to multiple ovulation in a 
tropical environment. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. [Internet]. 2019; 
51(8):2641–2644. doi: https://doi.org/mbdh
[22]  Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE). Manual 
terrestre: OIE – World Organisation for Animal Health [Internet]. 
Organización Mundial Sanidad Animal. 2015 [consultado 22 Jul. 
2023]; p. 1–3. Disponible en: https://goo.su/5NfdSw
[23]  Ayala LE, Pesantez JL, Rodas ER, Dután JB, Calle GR, Murillo YA, 
Vázquez JM, Nieto PE, Ortega VV, Samaniego JX. Dinámica folicular 
de vaquillas Criollas al pastoreo en el altiplano ecuatoriano. Arch. 
Zoot. [Internet]. 2019; 68(262):186–192. doi: https://doi.org/mfrb
[24]  Bó GA, Moreno D, Cutaia LE, Caccia M, Tríbulo RJ, Tríbulo HE. 
Transferencia de embriones a tiempo fijo: tratamientos y 
factores que afectan los índices de preñez. Taurus [Internet]. 
2004 [consultado 22 Jul. 2023]; 4(21):25–45. Disponible en: 
https://goo.su/qKQS16c.
[25]  Martínez AG, Brogliatti GM, Valcarcel A, de las Heras MA. 
Pregnancy Rates After Transfer of Frozen Bovine Embryos: A 
Field Trial. Theriogenol. [Internet]. 2002; 58(5):963–972. doi: 
https://doi.org/cwkm6x
[26]  Bényei B, Komlósi I, Pécsi A, Pollott G, Marcos C, de Oliveira–Campos 
A, Lemes MP. The Effect of Internal and External Factors on Bovine 
Embryo Transfer Results in a Tropical Environment. Anim. Reprod. 
Sci. [Internet]. 2006; 93(3–4):268–279. doi: https://doi.org/cvp5jw
[27]  Pérez–Mora A, Sura–Correa JC, Peralta–Torres JA. Factors 
associated with pregnancy rate in xed–time embryo transfer in 
cattle under humid–tropical conditions of México. Anim Reprod. 
[Internet]. 2020;17(2):202–216. doi: https://doi.org/d25q
[28]  Bilodeau–Goeseels S, Kastelic JP. Factors affecting embryo 
survival and strategies to reduce embryonic mortality in cattle. 
Can. J. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2003; 83(4):659–671. doi: https://
doi.org/ffzkc6
[29]  Jaśkowski BM, Herudzińska M, Gehrke M, Niżański W. The 
impact of the cavitary corpus luteum on the blood progesterone 
concentration and pregnancy rate of embryo recipient heifers. 
Theriogenol. [Internet]. 2022 178:73–76. doi: https://doi.org/mfrk
[30]  Gomes dos Santos GM, Bortolassi L, Silva–Santos KC, Ayres Dias J, 
da Silva Dias I, Seneda M, Morotti F. Conception rate and pregnancy 
loss in xed–time cattle embryo transfer programs are related to the 
luteal blood perfusion but not to the corpus luteum size. Theriogenol. 
[Internet]. 2023; 210:251–255. doi: https://doi.org/mfrm
[31]   Scenna FN, Edwards JL, Rohrbach NR, Hockett ME, Saxton 
AM, Schrick FN. Detrimental effects of prostaglandin F2α on 
preimplantation bovine embryos. prostaglandins other lipid. 
Mediat [Internet]. 2004;73(3–4):215–26. https://doi.org/cfv5n7
[32]  Scenna FN, Hockett ME, Towns TM, Saxton AM, Rohrbach NR, 
Wehrman ME, Schrick FN. Inuence of a prostaglandin synthesis 
inhibitor administered at embryo transfer on pregnancy rates 
of recipient cows. prostaglandins other lipid Mediat. [Internet]. 
2005; 78(1–4):38–45. doi: https://doi.org/cbf6bg
[33]   Sponchiado M, Gonella–Diaza AM, Rocha CC, Lo Turco EG, Pugliesi 
G, Leroy JLMR, Binelli M. The pre–hatching bovine embryo 
transforms the uterine luminal metabolite composition in vivo. 
Sci. Rep. [Internet]. 2019;9(1):1–14. doi: https://doi.org/gf8hcf