BACTIL-NIL®AQUA in infection with Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Litopenaus vannamei / Morales-Covarrubias et al. __________________________
2 of 9
INTRODUCTION
Marine shrimp farming has increased dramatically, from around
100 tons in the 1980s to about 4.5 million tons in 2018; the top ve
producers being China, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Ecuador.
The Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) is the main
cultivated aquatic species in the world, with a value of USD 18.46
billion in 2018 [10].
Despite this success, shrimp farming continues to suffer important
economic losses due to the impact of mainly viral diseases. More
recently, more concerns arised when bacterial diseases such as
Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND), formerly known as
early mortality syndrome (EMS) started to showed. This is a bacterial
shrimp disease due to the action of Pir A and B toxin secreted by
Vibrio parahaemolyticus [31] capable of destroying the cells (E, R, F,
and B) of the hepatopancreas, causing detachment of the tubular
epithelial cells, hemocytic inltration, and very marked necrosis of
the hepatopancreas [36]. In the terminal phase, in addition to the
shedding of epithelial cells, a massive secondary bacterial infection
occurs [26, 36]. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, V. campbellii, V. owensii, and
V. punensis have been proved to cause AHPND.
However, the mechanisms underlying the burgeoning number
of Vibrio species that cause AHPND is not complete known. All of
AHPND-causing Vibrio bacteria (V
AHPND
) harbor a highly homologous
plasmid (designated as pVA1-type) carrying pirAB
vp
toxin genes [12].
AHPND is characterized by sudden and massive mortalities (100%)
in post larvae or juveniles with 30 to 35 days (d) of culture [12, 25].
Antibiotics are used in aquaculture to control the development of
bacteria during the production process. However, misuse has led
to antibiotic resistance in both humans and animals. At present,
the use of these compounds is being restricted by the resistance
they can induce in different groups of microorganisms, either by
mismanagement of the effective doses or by new mechanisms that
allow them to generate resistance [1, 7]. The shrimp industry requires
other alternatives to inhibit microbial ora in production systems.
Among the sustainable strategies applied to modulate the intestinal
microora of shrimp, wide varieties of natural compounds are used,
such as organic acids (OA).
Specic OA alone or in combination are one of the alternatives for
nutritionally sustainable and environmentally friendly production. OA
are oxygenated compounds derived from hydrocarbons, and have
been widely used in formulations for animal nutrition. OA included
in balanced food function as preservatives, lowering the pH and
reducing microbial growth; although the main application is as an
antimicrobial with action in the digestive tract [1, 27].
The main effect of OA in shrimp is due to the fact that undissociated
molecules penetrate the cell walls of Gram-negative pathogenic
bacteria and acidies their cytoplasmic pH, for which the bacterial
cell needs to neutralize its pH through the proton pump H
+
-ATPase,
causing excessive energy expenditure. As undissociated OA molecules
continue to penetrate the bacterial cell walls, they rapidly deplete
their energy reserves, ultimately leading to cell death [27]. However,
there are very few studies on the antibacterial ecacy of OA in vivo
and in vitro, in shrimp with experimental infections. The primary
antimicrobial action of BACTI-NIL®AQUA (a synergistic blend of OA
mixture) is by altering the cell cytoplasm pH of bacteria and those that
are sensitive to such changes are inhibited, thus reducing harmful
bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract of the host animal.
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of dietary
supplementation of BACTI-NIL®AQUA (a synergistic blend of OA
mixture) on survival to V. parahaemolyticus (M0904AHPND+strain)
infection in L. vannamei and alterations in hepatopancreas using
wet analysis and histopathological analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial suspension preparation (inoculum)
A sample of V. parahaemolyticus used in this experiment was isolated
from shrimp farms affected by AHPND in north-western Mexico and
cryopreserved (Panasonic-U53VA-PA. USA) at –80°C [33]. The strain
was recovered from cryovials, inoculated in 10 mililiters (mL) of tryptic
soy broth (TSB) + 2.0% NaCl (TSB+ Bioxon), and incubated in a rotary
shaker (nb-205L N-BIOTEK. México) at 30°C for 24 hours (h). Bacterial
cells were washed by centrifugation (Refrigerated centrifuge FELISA-
TE-CR12-México) (2330 x Gears (G) for 20 minutes (min) at 20°C) and
the optical density (OD600 nanomer (-nm-) was adjusted to 1.0 [21].
One hundred microliters (µL) aliquot were inoculated in 40 mL of
TSB in triplicate; these samples were incubated in a rotary shaker
(VWR-Scientic-1516, USA) at 30 ± 1°C for 24 h, bacterial growth was
estimated by total viable count (TVC) on TCBS agar plates (BD Difco).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of BACTI-NIL®AQUA
(a synergistic blend of organic acids) against V. parahaemolyticus.
The MIC was determined in triplicate at concentrations of 500;
1,000; 1,500; 2,000; 3,000; 4,000; 5,000 (provided by the supplier),
8,000; and 9,000 parts per million (ppm) with pH 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0,
adding 100 μL of the bacterial inoculum 1x10
8
Colonies Former Units
(CFU)·mL
-1
and incubated (Shaking incubator-NB205L-Biotek-USA) at
30 ± 1°C for 24 h with constant stirring at a 125 revolution per minutes
(rpm). The samples were visually evaluated and those that did not
show turbidity were established as MIC [18, 20].
Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of BACTI-NIL®AQUA
(a synergistic blend of organic acids) against V. parahaemolyticus.
MBC was determined in triplicate with the concentrations that did
not produce turbidity (MIC), by adding 100 μL of the bacterial inoculum
1x10
8
CFU·mL
-1
in glass tube with tryptic soy broth (Bioxon
©
TSB, Mexico)
and 2.0% NaCl, for 24 h, at 30 ± 1°C. The lowest concentration, in which
colonies former units (CFU) did not occur, was considered MBC [20].
A positive (bacterial inoculum 1x10
8
CFU·mL
-1
) and a negative control
(only tryptic soy broth) were used to ensure adequate bacterial growth
during the incubation period and sterility of the mediums [15, 39].
Sensitivity of BACTI-NIL®AQUA against V. parahaemolyticus
The bactericidal capacity of the BACTI-NIL®AQUA was determined
by Bauer et al. [3] with each experiment done in triplicate. A colony
was selected and placed in a sterile saline solution until its turbidity
matched a Mac Farland standard 0.5 solution [21]. The test was
performed as follows:100 μL of bacterial suspension was added at
a concentration of 1×10
8
CFU·mL
-1
and swabbed on the surface of
Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates, supplemented with 2.5% NaCl,
pH 8.4. Sterile OXOID discs (OXOID antimicrobial susceptibility test
discs) measuring 8 milimeters (mm) diameter were impregnated with
three concentrations of with the BACTI-NIL®AQUA (10, 20 and 50 μL)
in triplicate including a negative control (only sterile OXOID discs)
and incubated at 30 ± 1°C for 24 h. According to the test for bacterial