
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Hernández et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2026, 43(3): e264334
5-6 |
Table 3. Antioxidant capacity in the silverskin of C. arabica L. var.
Acauã (AW), Sarchimor Rojo (CR) and Catucaí Amarillo
(CA).
Sample
TEAC-DPPH (mg.g
-1
DE)
(Mean ± S)
TEAC-FRAP (mg.g
-1
DE)
(Mean ± S)
US D US D
AW
81.25 ± 2.15
c
91.79 ± 0.87
b
58.34 ± 0.68
*d
89.61 ± 2.76
*c
CR
103.02 ± 5.16
a
108.61 ± 2.62
a
104.23 ± 0.09
*b
122.96 ± 1.39
*a
CA
27.33 ± 0.22
d
33.58 ± 0.68
d
35.72 ± 0.65
*f
39.79 ± 1.05
*e
US: Ultrasound extraction, D: Extraction by dynamic digestion. S: standard deviation. TEAC-
DPPH: Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity, using the DPPH free radical. TEAC-FRAP:
Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity, determined by ferric ion reducing antioxidant power.
*: There is interaction between the sample variables and the extraction method. Dierent
letters in the same variable (considering rows and columns) indicate statistically signicant
dierences according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
ideal characteristics for safe preservation and an outstanding
mineral contribution in potassium and nitrogen. When evaluating
the extraction methods, it was found that D extraction favored the
obtaining of phenolic compounds, while US maximized caeine
recovery. Specically, the CR variety stood out as the most promising
option due to its concentration of polyphenols, which justied its
superiority in relation to antioxidant capacity, leaving caeine without
an active role in this redox mechanism; however, if the extraction of
this alkaloid is prioritized, the AW variety was positioned as the best
source.
These ndings conrmed that this coee by-product transcends its
status as waste, representing a sustainable and valuable raw material
for the development of new functional foods and therapies aimed at
human health.
Literature cited
Association of Ocial Analytical Chemists, Inc. (AOAC). (1990). Ocial
methods of analysis. Association of Ocial Analytical Chemists, Inc.
Barreto Peixoto, J. A. B., Andrade, N., Machado, S., Costa, A. S. G., Puga, H.,
Oliveira, M. B. P. P., Martel, F., & Alves, R. C. (2022). Valorizing coee
silverskin based on its phytochemicals and antidiabetic potential: From
lab to a pilot scale. Foods, 11(12), Artículo 1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/
foods11121671
Benzie, I. F. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma
(FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Analytical
Biochemistry, 239(1), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292
Biondić Fučkar, V., Božić, A., Jukić, A., Krivohlavek, A., Jurak, G., Tot, A.,
Serdar, S., Žuntar, I., & Režek Jambrak, A. (2023). Coee silver skin-
health safety, nutritional value, and microwave extraction of proteins.
Foods, 12(3), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030518
Bobková, A., Poláková, K., Demianová, A., Belej, Ľ., Bobko, M., Jurčaga, L.,
Gálik, B., Novotná, I., Iriondo-DeHond, A., & del Castillo, M. D. (2022).
Comparative analysis of selected chemical parameters of Coea arabica,
from cascara to silverskin. Foods, 11(8), Artículo 1082. https://doi.
org/10.3390/foods11081082
Bojórquez-Quintal, E., Xotlanihua-Flores, D., Bacchetta, L., Diretto, G., Maccioni,
O., Frusciante, S., Rojas-Abarca, L. M., & Sánchez-Rodríguez, E. (2024).
Bioactive compounds and valorization of coee by-products from the
origin: A circular economy model from local practices in Zongolica,
México. Plants, 13(19), Artículo 2741. https://doi.org/10.3390/
plants13192741
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical
method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and
Technology, 28(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-
5
Campo Fernández, M., Palacios Marín, M. C., Panta Cuenca, A. P., Matute Castro,
N. L., Cuesta Rubio, O., Márquez Hernández, I., & Jaramillo Jaramillo,
C. G. (2024). Composición química y capacidad antioxidante de tres
variedades de cascarilla de café (Coea arabica). Revista Colombiana
de Química. 53(2), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.quim.
v53n2.117439
Campo-Fernández, M., Granja-Rizzo, D. F., Matute-Castro, N. L., Cuesta-Rubio,
O., & Márquez-Hernández, I. (2021). Microencapsulación mediante
secado por atomización a partir de un extracto de los cálices de Hibiscus
sabdaria L. Revista Colombiana de Química, 50(1), 40-50. https://doi.
org/10.15446/rev.colomb.quim.v50n1.88424
Eticha, S., & Bedassa, T. (2020). Determination of caeine in coee samples
by high performance liquid chromatography and ultra violet-visible
spectrophotometry methods from Wollega. International Journal of
Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 5(1), 8-15. https://doi.
org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200501.12
Fonseca-García, L., Calderón-Jaimes, L., & Rivera, M. (2014). Antioxidant
capacity and total phenol content in coee and coee by-products
produced and marketed in Norte de Santander (Colombia). Vitae, Revista
de la Facultad de Química Farmacéutica, 21(3), 228-236. http://www.
scielo.org.co/pdf/vitae/v21n3/v21n3a08.pdf
Franca, A. S., Basílio, E. P., Resende, L. M., Fante, C. A., & Oliveira, L. S. (2024).
Coee silverskin as a potential ingredient for functional foods: Recent
advances and a case study with chocolate cake. Foods, 13(23), Artículo
3935. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13233935
Gottstein, V., Bernhardt, M., Dilger, E., Keller, J., Breitling-Utzmann, C. M.,
Schwarz, S., Kuballa, T., Lachenmeier, D. W., & Bunzel, M. (2021).
Coee silver skin: Chemical characterization with special consideration
of dietary ber and heat-induced contaminants. Foods, 10(8), Artículo
1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081705
the literature respond not only to the physical state of the sample
(DE vs. crude drug) but also to the selectivity of the solvents and
the thermodynamic conditions of the process (Franca et al., 2024;
Taweekayujan et al., 2023; Vargas-Sánchez et al., 2023).
In addition, Pearson correlation coecient analysis conrmed
that antioxidant capacity is intrinsically linked to the polyphenolic
content of the samples evaluated (Kiss et al., 2025). A strong positive
correlation was identied between total phenols and the DPPH
assays (R=0.977) and FRAP (R=0.971), results that conrm these
metabolites as the main determinants of redox potential and radical
uptake, in correspondence with what was reported by Fonseca-García
et al. (2014) and Zengin et al. (2020). Likewise, the close relationship
between both quantication methods (R=0.931) validates their joint
use to accurately characterize these agro-industrial by-products.
On the contrary, the quantication of caeine showed a weak
correlation with the DPPH (R=0.552) and FRAP (R=0.236) indices,
diering from the behavior observed in the phenol analysis. This
trend conrms that caeine does not act as a reducing or radical
scavenging agent under the experimental conditions of these assays.
These ndings are consistent with what was reported by Jung et al.
(2021), who documented low and even negative correlations between
caeine and total polyphenols, as well as between this alkaloid
and antioxidant capacity by similar methods (DPPH and FRAP),
corroborating that the biological activity evaluated depends primarily
on the polyphenolic composition. The weak correlation observed did
not indicate an absence of antioxidant potential in caeine, but rather
a methodological limitation of the DPPH and FRAP assays. Lacking
phenolic hydroxyl groups, caeine did not participate eciently in
the electron or hydrogen atom transfer mechanisms that underpin
these techniques.
Conclusions
The analysis of the SS of the AW, CR, and CA varieties revealed
a valuable chemical and antioxidant prole that validates its
nutraceutical use. Initially, its proximate composition demonstrated